Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sultan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$48kEducation$12kYouth Development$7kHealth$5kPublic Benefit$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$309k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART$15,000
HINA MAUKA TEEN CARE PROGRAM$1,500
DOWNTOWN ART CENTER (DAC)$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PRAGER UNIVERSITY: $1k → 14%HONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART: $15k → 9%EASTER SEALS HAWAII: $5k → 15%HONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART: $12k → 9%PANIOLO PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $1k → 15%HONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART: $10k → 9%PUNAHOU SCHOOL: $10k → 9%HONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART: $8k → 9%DOWNTOWN ART CENTER (DAC): $1k → 9%HINA MAUKA TEEN CARE PROGRAM: $2k → 9%USS MISSOURI MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION: $2k → 9%ASSETS SCHOOL: $1k → 9%KA LAHUI KAI: $5k → 9%Tax Foundation of Hawaii: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
E Kupaku Ka Aina - the Hawaii Land Restoration Institute
Environment
2
Hawaii Education Institute
—
3
'Iolani School

To develop educated, well-rounded individuals who are well prepared for college.

Education
4
Na Kua Aina O Waimanalo
Arts & Culture
5
Hawaii Maritime Center
—
6
Hawaii Exemplary State Foundation
Community Improvement
7
Hawaii Book and Music Festival
Arts & Culture
8
Kula Aupuni Niihau a Kahelelani Aloha (Kanaka)

Preserve niihau cultural values and language.

Education
9
Mohala Pua School Dba Honolulu Waldorf School

See schedule o.at honolulu waldorf school, we educate each child to find meaning, passion, and purpose in life and to contribute to the creation of a better world for all. through a curriculum based on the developmental stages of the human…

Education
10
Pohaku Pelemaka

Our mission is to protect, perpetuate, and enhance: the intrinsic qualities of the lower puna area, native hawaiian wellbeing, and the transmission of intergenerational knowledge and practices in partnership with county, state, government,…

Human Services
11
Hawaii - American Nurses Association Foundation
Environment
12
Hawaii Pacific Model United Nations Incorporated
International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Assets School; the most unlike its peers is Tax Foundation of Hawaii. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART: $44,666 · Arts & CultureHONOLULU MUSEUM OF ARTKA LAHUI KAI: $5,000 · Arts & CultureKA LAHUI KAI+2 more: $2,500 · Arts & CulturePUNAHOU SCHOOL: $10,000 · EducationPUNAHOU SCHOOLASSETS SCHOOL: $1,000 · EducationASSETS SCHOOLHINA MAUKA TEEN CARE PROGRAM: $1,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherTAX FOUNDATION OF HAWAII: $1,000 · OtherDOWNTOWN ART CENTER (DAC): $1,000 · OtherPRAGER UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · OtherEASTER SEALS HAWAII: $5,000 · Health
Arts & Culture$52,166Education$11,000Other$5,500Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART: $44,666 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPUNAHOU SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKA LAHUI KAI: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetEASTER SEALS HAWAII: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUSS MISSOURI MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANIOLO PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASSETS SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAX FOUNDATION OF HAWAII: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sultan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sultan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sultan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph