· Public charity
Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative Inc
Provide safe, reliable, and affordable service to our members.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $62k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SKY ISLANDS REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP | $30,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SIERRA VISTA INC | $16,500 |
| COCHISE FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER INC DBA LORI'S PLACE | $15,000 |
| SCCFRA FOUNDATION INC | $6,000 |
| FMWR | $5,250 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 5% of Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in AZ; by stated purpose, 88%.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.
8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- BABoys and Girls Club of Sierra Vista Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $108k · revenue +128%
- TCTucson Conquistadores Inc5× · 2018–2022 · $54k · revenue +48%
- WTWillcox Theater and Arts Inc3× · 2022–2024 · $21k · revenue +54%
Funded once
- MEMCNEAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2024 · $20k
- MJMESCAL J6 FIRE DISTRICTone grant, 2022 · $15k
- SSSULPHUR SPRINGS VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $14k · revenue +31%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To develop, promote and preserve the general business and community interests served by the organization.
Sales of Electric power to Members. We had 13,355 meters in place at the end of 2024.
Chamber of commerce - to promote the city and surrounding area by providing customers with information about the city and surrounding areas
Through the operation of museums and support of historic preservation we will attempt to interpret and conserve our historical and cultural heritage. Through the presentation and support of cultural and educational programs we will attempt…
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Sierra Vista Inc ↗
- Who funds SKY ISLANDS REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds Tucson Conquistadores Inc ↗
- Who funds Willcox Theater and Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds COCHISE FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER INC dba LORIS PLACE ↗
- Who funds SULPHUR SPRINGS VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Santa Cruz County Fair Rodeo Assoc ↗
- Who funds REX ALLEN DAYS INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: The Legacy Foundation of Southeast Arizona
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative’s filings →