· Private foundation
Stuart a Miller Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $6k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $605k
- $250k+4 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI | $333,333 |
| WINSHIP CANCER INSTITUTE AT EMORY MIDTOWN | $300,000 |
| MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM | $250,000 |
| AMERICAN-ISRAEL DEMOCRACY COALITION | $250,000 |
| LEHRMAN COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL | $225,000 |
| DOLPHINS CANCER CHALLENGE | $100,000 |
| FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES | $100,000 |
| MIZEL INSTITUTE | $70,000 |
| ACHIEVE MIAMI | $60,000 |
| BAPTIST HEALTH SOUTH FLORIDA FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| PHASE ONE FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| THE BUONICONTI FUND TO CURE PARALYSIS | $25,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI | $25,000 |
| BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL TRUST | $10,000 |
| CROHNS & COLITIS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $310k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $885k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DCDOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC5× · 2018–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +128%
- MFMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN FLORIDA INC3× · 2018–2022 · $2.1M · revenue +53%
- UOUniversity of Miami8× · 2018–2025 · $886k · revenue +87%
Funded once
- JHJACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10.0M · revenue +26% · 55% of their budget
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI ATHLETICSone grant, 2017 · $100k
- UJUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Miami children's museum is a non-profit educational institution, which meets the needs of all children in our multicultural community. visitors of all ages are encouraged to play together, learn, imagine, and create. the museum offers…
Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Support of miami university
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Breakthrough Miami Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds University of Miami ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds LEHRMAN COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICA ISRAEL DEMOCRACY COALITION ↗
- Who funds MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Baptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVE MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA ↗
- Who funds ROESSLER-CHADWICK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SEEDS OF PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds JORGE M PEREZ ART MUSEUM OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE BUONICONTI FUND TO CURE PARALYSIS INC ↗
- Who funds LION GLOBAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PHASE ONE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds FAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds RANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds SAND & SURF SOCCER CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH BAY ARTIST COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds KINGS CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds A BREEZE OF HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH VOCATIONAL & CAREER COUNSELING SERVICE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way Miami Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Ansin Foundation · The Miami Foundation Inc · Ansin Foundation Inc · The Michael & Helen Schaffer Foundation · Albert H and Jane D Nahmad Foundation Inc · Julie and Martin Franklin Family Foundation Inc · The Kirk Foundation · Jacob and Anita Penzer Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stuart a Miller Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- His House Inc — 75% of income from government
- United Way Miami Inc — 23% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc — 4% of income from government
- Jackson Health Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Stuart a Miller Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Stuart a Miller Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.