Skip to content
Stonewall Inn Gives Back Initiative Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Stonewall Inn Gives Back Initiative Inc

The organization is dedicated to providing educational, strategic and financial assistance to grassroots organizations committed to advocacy for and crucial support to LGBTQ communities and individuals who suffer the indignities and fear arising from social intolerance here in the United States and around the world.

$56k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Civil Rights$70kHealth$6kHuman Services$6kCommunity Improvement$6k
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $30,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $56,125 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $26,125 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$351k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Allaince for Global Justice$10,000
Poder Inc$10,000
New York Transgender Advocay$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Utah Pride Center: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
UT
MO
AZ
TN
MS
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lesbian and Gay Community Services Center Inc

EMPOWERING LGBT PEOPLE, BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITY. NEW YORK CITY'S LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, & TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER EMPOWERS PEOPLE TO LEAD HEALTHY, SUCCESSFUL LIVES. The Center celebrates our community and advocates for justice and…

Human Services
2
The American Museum of Lesbian Gay Bisexual & Transgender History & Culture

Celebrate cultures of lgbtq+ people

—
3
Oklahoma City Pride Alliance Inc dba Oklahoma Pride Alliance

The Oklahoma Pride Alliance is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit focusing on the 2SLGBTQIA+ population and is committed to dismantling oppression through community empowerment, advocacy, and celebration. We center those most impacted by injustice to…

Civil Rights
4
Newburgh Lgbtqia Center

provide support & resources for LGBTQ POC

Human Services
5
Hudson Valley Lgbtq Community Center Inc

As a safe, supportive environment, the Hudson Valley LBGTQ Community Center provides services, professional resources, and programs that unite the lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans-gender, and queer community across lines of age, race, gender,…

Human Services
6
African American Office of Gay Concerns

To comprehensively serve as a resource for the well-being of gay men of color, inclusive but not limited to gay, bisexual & transgender & questioning communities through outreach, education & care.

—
7
Iraqueer Inc

The organization spread awareness on and advocate for the rights of LGBT people in Iraq through providing training producing publications providing direct services and other activities

Human Services
8
Lgbt Center Orlando Inc

Lgbt+ center orlando, inc provides a safe space, counseling, youth and senior programming. they also offer a food panty and a meeting space for social, support and recovery groups.

—
9
Carribean Equality Project Inc

The Caribbean Equality Project is an NYC-based community organization that empowers, advocates for, and represents Afro and Indo-Caribbean LGBTQ+ immigrants in New York City.

Human Services
10
Lgbt Center of Greater Reading

The lgbt center of greater reading creates, administers, and provides services, advocacy, and support to the greater reading lgbtq+ community, including our allies, with the goal that all may live a life of fulfillment, inclusion, and…

Civil Rights
11
Centre Lgbtqa Support Network

The Mission of Centre LGBT+ is to bring the community together through LGBT+ education, advocacy, and activities in the Centre Region

Civil Rights
12
Interpride

To contribute to the visibility and inclusion of diverse sexual orientations, gender identities and expressions, and sex characteristics (sogiesc) communities. to connect, grow, and support pride platforms and networks globally. to assist…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Pride Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Poder. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PODER: $10,000 · Civil RightsPODERNYTAG INC New York Transgender Advocacy Group: $10,000 · Civil RightsNYTAG INC New York Transgender Advocacy GroupCENTERLINK INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsCENTERLINK INCBORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTER: $6,417 · Civil RightsBORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTERKANSAS CITY CENTER FOR INCLUSION INC: $10,000 · OtherKANSAS CITY CENTER FOR…The Galaei Project: $7,500 · OtherThe Galaei ProjectOASIS CENTER INC: $6,417 · Community ImprovementOASIS CENTER INCGULF COAST EQUALITY: $6,417 · Community ImprovementGULF COAST EQUAL…Alliance for Global Justice Corp: $10,000 · InternationalAlliance for…Birmingham AIDS Outreach Inc: $6,417 · HealthUtah Pride Center Inc: $6,417 · Human Services
Civil Rights$36,417Other$17,500Community Improvement$12,834International$10,000Health$6,417Human Services$6,417

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS CITY CENTER FOR INCLUSION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetNYTAG INC New York Transgender Advocacy Group: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCENTERLINK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTER: $6,417 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetOASIS CENTER INC: $6,417 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBirmingham AIDS Outreach Inc: $6,417 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGULF COAST EQUALITY: $6,417 over 1y, 15% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stonewall Inn Gives Back Initiative Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stonewall Inn Gives Back Initiative Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Centerlink Inc: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stonewall Inn Gives Back Initiative Inc?

Find your warmest path to Stonewall Inn Gives Back Initiative Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $25k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stonewall Inn Gives Back Initiative’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home