How much does Stockamp Foundation give?

Stockamp Foundation reported 33 grants totaling $13,245 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 19 and 41 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.

What does Stockamp Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Religion (64%), Education (13%), Animals (7%).

Who are Stockamp Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Indiana Institute of Technology Inc ($6k), Dutch Sheets Ministries Inc ($2k), Mario Murillo Ministries ($1k).

Does Stockamp Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 35% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Stockamp Foundation accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as Stockamp Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Seckinger Foundation Corporation, Joyce a Ward Foundation, Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation.

Where is Stockamp Foundation based?

Stockamp Foundation is based in IN.

Stockamp Foundation

Stockamp Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Stockamp Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$4k

Largest

01What it funds

0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$43kEducation$9kAnimals$4kPublic Benefit$2kCivil Rights$1kHealth$950Human Services$800Crime & Legal$700Other$0

02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100

Median grant

States reached

$140k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
First Assembly of God	$4,200
Jerusalem Prayer Team	$1,500
Discover the Jewish Jesus	$1,200
Dutch Sheets Ministries	$1,200
The Oasis Church	$800
Individual grant recipient	$500
Impact Ministries	$400
Humane Fort Wayne	$350
Jeanne and Richard Kaskey Foundation Inc	$350
American Cornerstone Institute	$300
Hope Alive	$200
Prince of Peace Lutheran Church	$200
Concordia Education Foundation	$200
Mario Marillo Ministries	$200
Covenant House	$150

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $575) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$54k · 41 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$54k

$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%

+14%

Still filing today

61%

30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

AnimalsEducationPublic BenefitHuman ServicesCivil RightsCrime & LegalOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

II
INDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC
5× · 2017–2023 · $6k · revenue +31%
DS
DUTCH SHEETS MINISTRIES INC
2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +77%
AC
AMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INC
3× · 2022–2024 · $850 · revenue +42%

Funded once

IT
Indiana Tech University
one grant, 2018 · $1k
VP
Various Persons
one grant, 2021 · $520
HF
HOPE FOR ANIMALS INC
one grant, 2020 · $515 · revenue 0%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services

Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals

Global Animal Partnership

Animals

Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals

Brooks Institute for Animal Rights Law and Policy Inc

Philanthropy

Hope for China Dogs Rescue

At Hope for China Dogs, we are committed to combating the cruel and inhumane practice of the dog meat trade in China. We believe that every dog deserves to live a life free from pain and suffering, and we are dedicated to rescuing and…

Animals

Nonhuman Rights Project Inc

The Nonhuman Rights Project (NhRP) is the only civil rights organization in The United States dedicated solely to securing fundamental rights for nonhuman animals and the leading force in building a national and global nonhuman rights…

Animals

American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals

World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals

Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals

Network for Animals Usa Inc

Network for Animals crusades against cruelty to animals by focusing on direct action, often in far-flung, otherwise neglected places around the globe. We receive no government grants and rely on the generosity of our supporters to conduct…

Animals

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Freedom Watch Inc Center for Economic Justice. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 139 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

58/59

Grantees still filing

40/59

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$52,334Education$7,350Animals$2,894Religion$1,650Public Benefit$810Human Services$725Civil Rights$700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seckinger Foundation CorporationFL21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seckinger Foundation Corporation · Joyce a Ward Foundation · Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation · Bradford Family Foundation · PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · The Gerald B Shreiber Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Butchkie Foundation Inc · Susan & Jerome Ettelson Fund · Gat Family Foundation · The Susan and Ford Schumann Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stockamp Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stockamp Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Stockamp’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home