Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stevens Haven Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$242k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Human Services$316kAnimals$123kArts & Culture$75kPublic Safety & Disaster$75kReligion$61kEmployment$40kInternational$30kYouth Development$15k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $227k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASA GRANDE PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION$25,000
CASA GRANDE CHURCH F NAZARENE$25,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY$25,000
PINAL COUNTY VETERAN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$25,000
ARIZONA ANTI-TRAFFICING NETWORK$25,000
SEEDS OF HOPE$23,000
RMHC OF CENTRAL & NORTHERN ARIZONA$20,000
RMHC OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA$20,000
VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY$15,000
CENTRAL ARIZONA ANIMAL RESCUE INC$14,487
MERCY SHIPS$10,000
ITTY BITTY BOTTLE BABIES$5,000
CASA GRANDE YOUNG LIFE$5,000
COMMUNITY ACTION HUMAN RESOURCES AGENCY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SEEDS OF HOPE: $23k → 11%VETERANS 5-9: $15k → 11%VETERANS 5-9: $15k → 11%SEEDS OF HOPE: $7k → 11%SEEDS OF HOPE: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$675k · 15 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$675k
$35k

Still filing today

53%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureInternationalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PINAL COUNTY VETERANS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue +223% · 40% of their budget
  • AA
    ARIZONA ANTI-TRAFFICKING NETWORK
    3× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue +62%
  • Mercy Ships International
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • NH
    NONORING HIRING HELPING HEROS OF PINAL
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • CG
    CASA GRANDE YOUND LIFE
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Animal Rescue Mission

Keep families and pets together

Animals
2
Have a Great Spay

HAVEAGREATSPAYfundsspayandneutersurgeriestodogsandcatsownedbyfinanciallychallengedcitizensinthegreaterPhoenixmetroarea.Anapproximately1,100surgeriesarefundedannually.

Animals
3
Saving Animals From Euthanasia

Safe has an adoption program where SAFE receives animals from the public and shelters in So. AZ. SAFE places the animals in foster homes provides medical care sterilization vaccines and microchips for all animals. They are adopted into…

Animals
4
Chama Valley Humane Society

To end the abuse and neglect of companion animals in our service area through education, rescuing, fostering, rehoming, and spay/neuter programs.

Animals
5
Yavapai Humane Trappers Animal Search

Animal search and rescue, vetting, rehome and placement of unwanted and abandoned pets, primarily in northern arizona.sponsors a foster pet program and overpopulation program of spay and neuter.

Animals
6
Hope Ranch Animal Sanctuary

Animal rescue

Animals
7
Alliance for Arizona Animal Protection

Prevention of animal cruelty and intervention on behalf of animals being abused.

Animals
8
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
9
Blackhat Humane Society

Rescue and adopt out abandoned animals on navajo reservation

Animals
10
Humane Society of Aransas County

Humane animal shelter

Animals
11
Arkansas Animal Alliance Inc

Nonprofit animal rescue

Animals
12
Valley of the Sun Dog Rescue

Rescue Dogs and place them in safe homes

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Veterans 5-9; the most unlike its peers is Pinal County Veterans Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CASA GRANDE PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION: $75,000 · OtherCASA GRANDE PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATIONST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $75,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETYRMHC OF CENTRAL & NORTHERN ARIZONA: $50,000 · OtherRMHC OF CENTRAL & NORTHERN ARIZONARMHC OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $40,000 · OtherRMHC OF SOUTHERN ARIZONANEW BEGINNINGS CHURCH: $35,500 · OtherNEW BEGINNINGS CHURCHNONORING HIRING HELPING HEROS OF PINAL: $25,000 · OtherNONORING HIRING HELPING HEROS OF PINALCASA GRANDE CHURCH F NAZARENE: $25,000 · OtherCASA GRANDE CHURCH F NAZARENECASA GRANDE YOUNG LIFE: $15,000 · OtherITTY BITTY BOTTLE BABIES INC: $15,000 · Other+1 more: $10,000 · OtherARIZONA ANTI-TRAFFICKING NETWORK: $75,000 · Human ServicesARIZONA ANTI-TRAFFICK…SEEDS OF HOPE INC: $36,400 · Human ServicesSEEDS OF HOPE INCVETERANS 5-9: $30,000 · Human ServicesVETERANS 5-9VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $65,000 · AnimalsVALLEY HUMANE SO…CENTRAL ARIZONA ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $43,243 · AnimalsCENTRAL ARIZONA …PINAL COUNTY VETERANS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Arts & CulturePINAL COUNT…Mercy Ships International: $30,000 · InternationalCOMMUNITY ACTION HUMAN RESOURCES AGENCY: $15,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$365,500Human Services$141,400Animals$108,243Arts & Culture$75,000International$30,000Housing & Shelter$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPINAL COUNTY VETERANS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 40% of budgetARIZONA ANTI-TRAFFICKING NETWORK: $75,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetVALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $65,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetCENTRAL ARIZONA ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $43,243 over 3y, 21% of budgetSEEDS OF HOPE INC: $36,400 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetVETERANS 5-9: $30,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetMercy Ships International: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION HUMAN RESOURCES AGENCY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PINAL COUNTY VETERANS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA ANTI-TRAFFICKING NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL ARIZONA ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds SEEDS OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS 5-9 ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION HUMAN RESOURCES AGENCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stevens Haven Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stevens Haven Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stevens Haven’s filings →

    More from the funding graph