Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stevens Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$370k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$225k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Philanthropy$2.4MEducation$1.6MRecreation & Sports$555kArts & Culture$357kHealth$204kCommunity Improvement$135kHuman Services$79kYouth Development$60kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $133k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $225k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED STATES SKI TEAM FOUNDATION$225,000
SUN VALLEY BALLET FOUNDATION INC$47,840
SUN VALLEY COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC$35,500
SUN VALLEY COMMUNITY SCHOOL INC$25,000
GUTS GEAR INC$25,000
SWIFTSURE RANCH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC$7,000
BOULDER MOUNTAIN CLAYWORKS INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SPUR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1.4M → 7%SPUR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $636k → 7%SPUR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200k → 7%SPUR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $103k → 7%SPUR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $100k → 7%SWIFTSURE RANCH THERAPUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC: $14k → 7%SWIFTSURE RANCH THERAPUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC: $11k → 7%SWIFTSURE RANCH THERAPUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC: $11k → 7%SWIFTSURE RANCH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC: $8k → 7%SWIFTSURE RANCH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC: $7k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MI
NY
IA
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
LA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 7 repeat orgs$862k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
20

Total granted

$2.3M
$832k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+38%

Still filing today

86%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    Sun Valley Community School Inc
    6× · 2018–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +56%
  • US
    United States Ski Team Foundation
    3× · 2022–2024 · $375k · revenue +22%
  • 8
    826LA
    3× · 2019–2023 · $100k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • AS
    ARGYOS - SUN VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS
    one grant, 2022 · $150k
  • A
    ARGYROS
    one grant, 2020 · $125k
  • SB
    South Bay Boardriders Club
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -65% · 44% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Ski Association

United States Ski Association is the national governing body overseeing the sports of Olympic and Paralympic skiing and snowboarding in the United States. See Schedule O for continuation.

Recreation & Sports
2
Steamboat Springs Winter Sports Club Inc

To create champions on and off the mountain by developing life skills and providing growth opportunities through participation in sports.

3
Sos Outreach

Sos outreach changes young lives, building character and leadership in underserved kids through mentoring outdoors.

Recreation & Sports
4
Santa Barbara Education Foundation

Santa Barbara Education Foundation (SBEF) provides and supports programs that enrich the academic, artistic, and personal development of all students in the Santa Barbara Unified School District.

Education
5
Ussa Investment Fund

Operates exclusively to manage the investment of endowment gifts made for the benefit of supporting the development, training, and competition of elite national, international, and development athletes in skiing and snowboarding.

Recreation & Sports
6
United States Skiing Foundation

United states skiing foundation is engaged in not-for-profit membership, competition, training, development, and educational activities related to amateur skiers and snowboarders who are, or aspire to become, members of the u.s. ski and…

7
Woodcraft Rangers

The goals of woodcraft's nvision after school program are to decrease risk factors impinging on children and youth and to increase their chances for success in school and in life through youth development programs for low income and/or…

8
Grand Canyon Council Inc Boy Scouts of America

The mission of scouting america is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law. (continued on schedule o)programs of scouting america and grand…

9
Vail Valley Foundation

Vail valley foundation was created to enhance the quality of life in the vail valley and showcase our community to a global audience through arts, athletics, and education.

Community Improvement
10
Girl Scouts of California's Central Coast

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence & character, who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
11
Girl Scouts of Utah

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
12
San Luis Valley Great Outdoors

At slv go! our mission is to connect people to the outdoors by expanding opportunities for trails, parks, and public lands through community-driven initiatives.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sun Valley Center for the Arts Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsYouth Ice Hockey ProgramsCommunity Arts OrganizationsProfessional Ballet Compani…Christian Missionary Organi…Animal Rescue and AdoptionDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Veteran Support ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…Cancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%4%<5yr15%4%5–10yr18%24%10–20yr15%32%20–35yr11%16%35–55yr17%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%1%<5yr15%0%5–10yr18%50%10–20yr15%7%20–35yr11%33%35–55yr17%11%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
18%
1,676/9,394

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SPUR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,415,182 · Human ServicesSPUR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC+1 more — $50,790 · Human ServicesSun Valley Community School Inc — $1,537,779 · EducationSun Valley Community School Inc826LA — $100,000 · Education826LAARGYOS - SUN VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS — $150,000 · OtherARGYOS - SUN VAL…ARGYROS — $125,000 · OtherARGYROSEPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $100,000 · OtherEPIDERMOLYSIS BU…THE SUN VALLEY BALLET FOUNDATION INC — $97,840 · OtherTHE SUN VALLEY B…SUN VALLEY SKI EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $79,600 · OtherSUN VALLEY SKI E…CHANDLER COMPADRES INC — $50,000 · OtherCHANDLER COMPADR…SUN VALLEY CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $39,257 · OtherHIGHER GROUND FOUNDATION — $27,500 · OtherPathLight International Inc — $50,000 · OtherPathLight Intern…+10 more — $83,000 · Other+10 moreUnited States Ski Team Foundation — $375,000 · Recreation & SportsSouth Bay Boardriders Club — $100,000 · EnvironmentGRADES OF GREEN INC — $25,000 · EnvironmentArts Council of Greater Baton Rouge Inc — $65,000 · Arts & CultureBOULDER MOUNTAIN CLAYWORKS INC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER LOS ANGELES AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE — $10,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$2,465,972Education$1,637,779Other$802,197Recreation & Sports$375,000Environment$125,000Arts & Culture$70,000Youth Development$60,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSPUR COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,415,182 over 3y, 22% of budgetSun Valley Community School Inc — $1,537,779 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetUnited States Ski Team Foundation — $375,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSouth Bay Boardriders Club — $100,000 over 1y, 44% of budget826LA — $100,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetEPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetSUN VALLEY SKI EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $79,600 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetArts Council of Greater Baton Rouge Inc — $65,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSWIFTSURE RANCH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC — $50,790 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHANDLER COMPADRES INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetPathLight International Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetSUN VALLEY CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $39,257 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGRADES OF GREEN INC — $25,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCARITAS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVOCATES FOR SURVIVORS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & SEXUAL ASSAULT INC — $6,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOULDER MOUNTAIN CLAYWORKS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOperation Second Chance Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBE GOOD FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Spur Community Foundation IncID17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Spur Community Foundation Inc · Heinz Family Foundation · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Boswell Family Foundation · The Springcreek Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Jd Robertson Foundation · The Von Der Heyden Family Foundation · Nicholas Martin Jr Family Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Otis Booth Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stevens Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph