Skip to content

· Private foundation

Steven and Pia Scaba Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$417k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Religion$648kYouth Development$35kPhilanthropy$20kHuman Services$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$16kEducation$14kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $95k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $172k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$5,001
Median grant
4
States reached
$12k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LARCHWOOD SYNAGOGUE$150,000
FOUNDATION FOR SEPHARDIC STUDIES BNEI YITZHAK$36,304
PORAT YOSEPH FOUNDATION (IKE HIDARY)$35,000
YESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH INC$28,500
CHABAD TORAH CENTER (RABBI SHAPIRO)$21,600
CONG MISCHKNOIS LAVIER YAKOV INC (RABBI KATZ)$16,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT BENEI RACHEL (EREZ ISRAEL)$13,000
HATZALAH EMS OF THE JERSEY SHORE$12,000
YESHIVAT LEV TORAH (JOEY MAMROOT)$10,000
YESHIVAT NOAM EZRA (RABBI AHINOAM AHARON)$9,150
JCF FIDELITY THE DONORS FUND OJC$7,700
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOLLEL ZICHRON SHIMON (RABBI ASSULI FRENCH)$7,200
MASKEEL EL DAL SOCIETY INC (RABBI YAAKOV BENHAIM)$6,700
DEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC$5,200
SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC$5,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MY SOLDIER: $350 → 6%MICHAEL M KAMEO FOUNDATION: $4k → 6%SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $5k → 20%A TIME: $500 → 20%LEOVDEI HASHEM INC: $4k → 20%THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER INC: $10k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$530k · 17 repeat orgs$238k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
12

Total granted

$530k
$129k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+12%

Still filing today

18%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $109k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LARCHWOOD SYNAGOGUE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $152k
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR SEPHARDIC STUDIES BNEI YITZHAK
    3× · 2023–2025 · $148k
  • YO
    YESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH
    3× · 2023–2025 · $37k

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIGDAL OHR (RABBI GROSSMAN)
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $18k
  • AS
    ARAM SOBA RAANANA (MICHAL TAWIL)
    one grant, 2024 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tzohar Halev Inc

Support of tzohar-a school for special needs children located in israel

Education
2
Sha Arim Inc

To provide jewish education to children with learning disabilities and special needs in the minneapolis area

Education
3
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
4
Bais Medrash Mayan Hatorah

To provide religious education and services to our students in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith

—
5
Hitmasrut Inc

Jewish educational programs

Religion
6
Shaare Mordechai Inc

The organization's primary mission is charitable and religious in nature, supporting judaic and rabbinical education by providing financial assistance to institutions of jewish learning, currently through grants to shaare mordechai in…

Religion
7
Yeshiva Bais Mordechai of Teaneck

To provide religious Jewish education.

Education
8
Cheder Shiras Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
9
Meir Isa Bracha Inc

To help establish and maintain agendas for Hebrew and religious enlightenment

Religion
10
Beth Medrash Govoha of New York Inc

Jewish education & development

Religion
11
Bnot Shirah of Deal Inc

Providing jewish and secular eduation for elementary school aged children.

Education
12
Chaverim Lemitzva Inc

Help promote jewish education

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Special Children Center; the most unlike its peers is My Soldier Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LARCHWOOD SYNAGOGUE INC: $151,502 · OtherLARCHWOOD SYNAGOGUE INCFOUNDATION FOR SEPHARDIC STUDIES BNEI YITZHAK: $148,479 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR SEPHARDIC STUDIES BNEI YITZHAKAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIGDAL OHR (RABBI GROSSMAN): $40,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIGDAL OHR (RABBI GROSSMAN)YESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH: $37,100 · OtherYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSHPORAT YOSEPH FOUNDATION (IKE HIDARY): $35,000 · OtherCONG MISCHKNOIS LAVIER YAKOV INC (RABBI KATZ): $33,000 · Other+28 more: $241,401 · Other+28 moreDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $35,400 · Youth DevelopmentTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $5,200 · Human ServicesMICHAEL M KAMEO FOUNDATION INC: $3,600 · Human ServicesLEOVDEI HASHEM INC: $3,600 · Human Services+2 more: $850 · Human ServicesBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationTHE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC: $3,600 · EducationTHE LIFE IS GOOD PLAYMAKER PROJECT INC: $5,501 · PhilanthropyMIDRASH ZION CORP: $3,600 · Philanthropy
Other$686,482Youth Development$35,400Human Services$23,250Education$13,600Philanthropy$9,101

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $35,400 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LIFE IS GOOD PLAYMAKER PROJECT INC: $5,501 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMICHAEL M KAMEO FOUNDATION INC: $3,600 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetMIDRASH ZION CORP: $3,600 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC: $3,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMY SOLDIER INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BARKAI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE LIFE IS GOOD PLAYMAKER PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MICHAEL M KAMEO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LEOVDEI HASHEM INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDRASH ZION CORP ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY18.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Scaba Family Foundation Inc · Samuel & Mollie Jemal Foundation Co Jem Realty · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Steven and Pia Scaba Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Steven and Pia Scaba Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • The Special Children Center: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Steven and Pia Scaba Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Steven and Pia Scaba Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Steven and Pia Scaba Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph