Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sterns Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$57k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$127kEducation$65kFood & Nutrition$30kHuman Services$22kEnvironment$17kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $42,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $57,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $15,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRANT COUNTY FAIR BOARD$20,000
CUSTER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$10,000
CRANE RIVER THEATER$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING$2,000
SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY$2,000
EASTERN WYOMING COLLEGE$1,000
CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY$1,000
SOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MINES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%PIONEER MEMORIAL REST HOME & HEALTH SERVICES: $10k → 9%VILLAGE OF HYANNIS: $20k → 11%PRAIRIE PIONEER CENTER INC: $12k → 11%FOOD BANK OF THE HEARTLAND: $30k → 12%NEBRASKA LAND TRUST: $10k → 13%CHADRON STATE COLLEGE: $1k → 13%DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION - FORT KEARNEY CHAPTER: $7k → 13%SHERIDAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $20k → 15%DAWES COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $20k → 16%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%CASPER COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 11%EASTERN WYOMING COLLEGE: $2k → 15%SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 13%SOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MINES: $1k → 14%HOOKER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%AEOLA H BRENNEMAN LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%NEBRASKA LAND TRUST: $7k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA - KEARNEY: $3k → 13%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%CASPER COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 11%EASTERN WYOMING COLLEGE: $1k → 15%SOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOL OF MINES: $1k → 14%AEOLA H BRENNEMAN LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $7k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA - LINCOLN: $1k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA - KEARNEY: $2k → 13%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%CASPER COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 11%GRANT COUNTY: $10k → 11%SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA - KEARNEY: $2k → 13%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA - KEARNEY: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$79k · 12 repeat orgs$192k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
12

Total granted

$79k
$157k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+29%

Still filing today

25%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NEBRASKA LAND TRUST INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $17k · revenue +43%
  • AH
    AEOLA H BRENNEMANN LIBRARY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $17k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA - KEARNEY
    4× · 2020–2023 · $8k

Funded once

  • FB
    FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLANDgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +29%
  • BC
    BUFFALO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +141%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Dakota Historical Society Foundation

Preserve south dakota history

Arts & Culture
2
North Dakota Natural Resources Trust
—
3
Hastings Museum

The mission of the hastings museum is to bring to life the natural and cultural history of hastings, adams county and the great plains of nebraska through the use of educational programs, exhibits and films.

—
4
Carver County Historical Society

To collect, preserve and interpret the history of carver county. to preserve and interpret the andrew peterson farm through the lens of minnesota's rich immigrant and agricultural history.

Arts & Culture
5
Nd Natural Resources Conservation Trust

To promote the conservation of natural resources in the state of north dakota

Environment
6
Union County Historical Society

Preservation of union county iowa hisorical information and artifacts.

—
7
Dawson County Historical Society

Operation of Historical Museum for the collection, preparation and display of artifacts from Dawson County Nebraska and disseminate and educate the public about Dawson County and it's historical treasures.

Arts & Culture
8
Saunders County Historical Society

Preserve artifacts and information regarding the history of saunders county nebraska and educate citizens about the social, economic, cultural and political history of saunders county

Arts & Culture
9
Adams County Historical Society

Services include providing public with educational resources including research, maps, photos, and historical news of adams county, nebraska.

—
10
Museum of Nebraska Art

The museum of nebraska art (mona) celebrates the history of nebraska's visual art for diverse audiences. mona collects, preserves, researches, exhibits, and interprets the work of artists who were born, lived, trained, or worked in…

Arts & Culture
11
Conservation Nebraska

Protect nebraska's natural legacy by educating the public, supporting communities, and increasing civic engagement.

Environment
12
Nebraska Corn Growers Association

To promote corn and corn products

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Nebraska Land Trust Inc; the most unlike its peers is Crane River Theater Company Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $30,000 · OtherFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLANDGRANT COUNTY FAIR BOARD: $20,000 · OtherGRANT COUNTY FAIR BOARDIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDAWES COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $20,000 · OtherDAWES COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYSHERIDAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $20,000 · OtherSHERIDAN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INCAEOLA H BRENNEMANN LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $16,500 · OtherAEOLA H BRENNEMANN LIBRARY FOUNDATIONPRAIRIE PIONEER CENTER INC: $12,050 · OtherPRAIRIE PIONEER CENTER INCCUSTER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10,000 · OtherPIONEER MEMORIAL REST HOME & HEALTH SERVICES: $10,000 · OtherGRANT COUNTY: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA - KEARNEY: $8,000 · OtherCASPER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT: $8,000 · Other+11 more: $39,000 · Other+11 moreBUFFALO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $25,000 · Arts & CultureBUFFALO CO…THE NEBRASKA LAND TRUST INC: $17,000 · EnvironmentHOOKER CTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONINC: $5,000 · PhilanthropySDSM&T CENTER FOR ALUMNI RELATIONS & ADVANCEMENT: $3,000 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · Education
Other$223,550Arts & Culture$25,000Environment$17,000Philanthropy$5,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBUFFALO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $25,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetTHE NEBRASKA LAND TRUST INC: $17,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHOOKER CTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONINC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCRANE RIVER THEATER COMPANY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSDSM&T CENTER FOR ALUMNI RELATIONS & ADVANCEMENT: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds BUFFALO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE NEBRASKA LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE PIONEER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CUSTER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HOOKER CTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds CRANE RIVER THEATER COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds SDSM&T CENTER FOR ALUMNI RELATIONS & ADVANCEMENT ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sterns Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sterns Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sterns Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Sterns Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $172k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sterns’ filings →

    More from the funding graph