Skip to content

· Private foundation

Steps Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0173% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$13kReligion$7kAnimals$1kHealth$700Housing & Shelter$600International$270Environment$100Food & Nutrition$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
7
States reached
$675k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,950
Individual grant recipient$700
CARPENTERS HOUSE$600
Individual grant recipient$500
PAWS$200
BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP$150
RED TAIL LAND CONSERVANCY$100
SHALOM CENTER FOOD PANTRY$100
Individual grant recipient$100
CHRIST STARFISH FOUNDATION$100
ST JUDE$50
LIFESPRINGS CHURCH$50
BRIAN ESSARY MINISTRIES$50
DAV$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $450) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CHRIST STARFISH FOUNDATION: $100 → 14%Christ's Starfish Foundation: $100 → 14%CHRIST STARFISH FOUNDATION: $100 → 14%CHRIST STARFISH FOUNDATION: $100 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
WI
MA
IN
OH
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$30k · 9 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
22

Total granted

$30k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+23%

Still filing today

22%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2023–2025 · $13k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2023–2025 · $7k
  • RF
    Randolph Friends Church
    2× · 2020–2021 · $4k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $800
  • IC
    In Christs Hands Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue +23%
  • TL
    TRUE LIFE CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $400
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Great Commission Broadcasting Corp Attn Broc Hampsmire

To communicate the gospel of jesus christ to the world; to uplift, edify and encourage.

Arts & Culture
2
In Christ Ministries Inc

In Christ Ministries exists to bring the message of Gods love grace and truth to children teens and adults. We do this through training and outreach events.

Religion
3
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
4
Red Cristiana Inc

Religious organization

Religion
5
Insight for Living

Insight for living is a christian radio ministry that teaches the practical application of the bible. insight for living reaches audiences through radio sermons, compact disc recordings, dvd's, podcasts, internet access, books,…

Religion
6
Rob White Ministries Inc

Making disciples of jesus christ through the testifying, sharing and teaching of the gospel of jesus christ

Religion
7
Intentional Life Media

Dedicated to igniting personal transformation by affirming faith, inspiring hope, and equipping individuals, to live an intentional life in christ.

Religion
8
Bsf International Llc

Bsf international, llc, administers bible study classes across the world in support of bible study fellowship, an interdenominational lay christian organization.

Religion
9
National Christian Network

Religious programming

Religion
10
Jesus Ministries International

To minister to the church at large the healing love of god via preaching and teaching the truth of the bible. through preaching the word of god, people will experience the peace of god, comfort for their souls, and healing of broken…

Religion
11
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
12
International Edifying Christ

Ministry

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bible Study Fellowship; the most unlike its peers is In Christs Hands Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $13,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $7,450 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRandolph Friends Church: $3,500 · OtherRandolph Friends ChurchIndividual grant recipient: $2,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+27 more: $7,050 · Other+27 moreIn Christs Hands Inc: $500 · ReligionBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $400 · ReligionBRIAN ESSARY MINISTRIES INC: $50 · ReligionCHRIST'S STARFISH FOUNDATION INC: $400 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50 · Human ServicesGSD RESCUE INDY INC: $300 · AnimalsST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 · HealthRED-TAIL LAND CONSERVANCY INC: $100 · Environment
Other$33,600Religion$950Human Services$450Animals$300Health$100Environment$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIn Christs Hands Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHRIST'S STARFISH FOUNDATION INC: $400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGSD RESCUE INDY INC: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIAN ESSARY MINISTRIES INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRANDOLPH COUNTY YMCA INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds In Christs Hands Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST'S STARFISH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP ↗
  • Who funds GSD RESCUE INDY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds RED-TAIL LAND CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIAN ESSARY MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds RANDOLPH COUNTY YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE4.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Steps Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Steps Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Steps’ filings →

More from the funding graph