Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stephenson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$655k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$180k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$3.5MYouth Development$460kEducation$345kArts & Culture$250kHuman Services$226kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $605k
$100,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$180,000
ELEAZAR WHEELOCK HOUSE$125,000
THE BOWERY MISSION$100,000
APOSTLES BY THE SEA INC$100,000
THE VERITAS FORUM$100,000
YALE CENTER FOR FAITH & CULTURE$25,000
TRINITY ANGLICAN CHURCH$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $226k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHARITY WATER: $126k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $100k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
CT
CO
VA
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.2M · 12 repeat orgs$435k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$5.2M
$335k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+10%

Still filing today

42%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA
    6× · 2018–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +4%
  • CH
    Christian Herald Association Inc
    5× · 2018–2025 · $695k · revenue +46%
  • CHARITY GLOBAL INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $226k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF DARTHMOUTH COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    one grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue +10%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gordon College

Gordon college strives to graduate men & women distinguished by (continued on schedule o) (continuation) intellectual maturity and christian character, committed to lives of service and prepared for leadership worldwide.

Education
2
Houghton University

Houghton university provides an academically challenging, christ-centered education in the liberal arts and sciences to students from diverse traditions and economic backgrounds and equips them to lead and labor as scholar-servants in a…

Education
3
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
4
Christian Union Inc

To transform our nation and world by developing and connecting bold christian leaders.

Religion
5
Geneva College

Geneva college is a christ-centered academic community that provides a comprehensive education to equip students for faithful and fruitful service to god and neighbor.

Education
6
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
7
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of jesus christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
8
Corporation of Haverford College

Haverford college is committed to providing a liberal arts education in the broadest sense. this education, based on a rich academic curriculum at its core, is distinguished by a commitment to excellence and a concern for individual…

Education
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Whitworth University

Since 1890, whitworth has held fast to its founding mission of providing "an education of mind and heart" through rigorous intellectual inquiry guided by dedicated christian scholars.

Education
11
Northeastern Seminary

Northeastern seminary strives to be a vibrant source for christian theological formation whose students are formed in a biblical vision of gracious christianity and impact wholeness to the world in an expansive array of vocations and…

Education
12
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Charity Global Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $1,750,000 · ReligionInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSAChristian Herald Association Inc: $695,000 · ReligionChristian Herald Association IncTHE VERITAS FORUM INC: $125,000 · ReligionCENTRAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $896,667 · OtherCENTRAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $300,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYALE CENTER FOR FAITH AND CULTURE: $275,000 · OtherYALE CENTER FOR FAITH AND CULTUREPROGRACE: $160,000 · OtherPROGRACETRINITY ANGLICAN CHURCH: $132,000 · OtherTRINITY ANGLICAN CHURCHTRUSTEES OF DARTHMOUTH COLLEGE: $100,000 · OtherAPOSTLES BY THE SEA INC: $100,000 · Other+6 more: $210,000 · Other+6 moreNEW CITY KIDS INC: $385,000 · Youth DevelopmentNEW CITY …YOUNG LIFE: $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIF…Eleazar Wheelock House Inc: $250,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $50,000 · EducationCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $226,000 · Human Services
Religion$2,570,000Other$2,173,667Youth Development$460,000Education$300,000Human Services$226,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $1,750,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetChristian Herald Association Inc: $695,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetNEW CITY KIDS INC: $385,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetEleazar Wheelock House Inc: $250,000 over 2y, 81% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $226,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VERITAS FORUM INC: $125,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
  • Who funds Christian Herald Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW CITY KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Eleazar Wheelock House Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VERITAS FORUM INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stephenson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stephenson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stephenson’s filings →

More from the funding graph