Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stephen D Mitchell Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$150k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$593kRecreation & Sports$231kHealth$152kEducation$38kHuman Services$31kYouth Development$31kFood & Nutrition$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $76k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH$60,000
FAITH CHAPEL$40,500
CANCER SURVIVORS PARK ALLIANCE$25,100
CHALLENGE TO CONQUER CANCER$10,000
THOMAS HEYWARD ACADEMY TRADD WOODS MEMORIAL FUND$6,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$3,500
ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$1,500
MEALS ON WHEELS$1,000
ST JAMES SANTEE BRICK CHURCH$1,000
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LET THERE BE MOM: $5k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVEOPMENTAL SERVICES: $6k → 10%LET THERE BE MOM: $5k → 10%LET THERE BE MOM: $5k → 10%LET THERE BE MOM: $4k → 10%YMCA OF GREENVILLE: $300 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 19 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
16

Total granted

$1.1M
$121k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+9%

Still filing today

53%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CANCER SURVIVORS PARK ALLIANCE
    6× · 2018–2024 · $47k · revenue +12%
  • TH
    THOMAS HEYWARD ACADEMY INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $22k · revenue +30%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $21k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • SA
    ST ANDREWS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • NC
    NEIGHBORHOOD CANCER CONNECTIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $16k · revenue +45%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

5
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
6
Mcleod Physician Associates Ii

Mcleod physician associates ii operates as a part of the mcleod health system. the mission of mcleod health is to improve the overall health and well being of people living within south carolina and eastern north carolina by providing…

Health
7
Beat Childhood Cancer Foundation Inc

Beat childhood cancer drives childhood cancer research and raises awareness, making a difference in kids' survival today. our vision is to change the story for the next family by finding viable treatments and ultimately, cures for…

Health
8
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
9
Lung Cancer Initiative

Our mission is to advance survivorship and provide support to those affected by lung cancer through research, education, and access programs.

Health
10
City of Hope National Medical Center

City of Hope National Medical Center's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
11
Thompson Cancer Survival Center

Thompson Cancer Survival Center provides support services for cancer patients, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to…

12
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc and the most unlike its peers is Partnership for ReNEWaL. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $268,000 · OtherST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCHYMCA CAMP GREENVILLE — $230,000 · OtherYMCA CAMP GREENVILLEFAITH CHAPEL — $128,500 · OtherFAITH CHAPELST ANDREWS CHURCH — $60,000 · OtherST ANDREWS CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $55,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE BRICK CHURCH — $50,000 · Other+17 more — $163,500 · Other+17 moreCANCER SURVIVORS PARK ALLIANCE — $47,100 · HealthCANCER SU…CHALLENGE TO CONQUER CANCER — $42,000 · HealthCHALLENGE…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $6,300 · HealthAMERICAN …SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $4,160 · Health+3 more — $4,100 · HealthTHOMAS HEYWARD ACADEMY INC — $22,000 · EducationTHE FRAZEE CENTER — $16,000 · EducationPartnership for ReNEWaL — $30,000 · ReligionLET THERE BE MOM INC — $19,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES — $6,000 · Human Services+1 more — $300 · Human ServicesYOUNG LIFE — $21,000 · Youth DevelopmentTRIUNE MERCY CENTER — $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$955,200Health$103,660Education$38,000Religion$30,000Human Services$25,300Youth Development$21,000Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCANCER SURVIVORS PARK ALLIANCE — $47,100 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetCHALLENGE TO CONQUER CANCER — $42,000 over 8y, 5.5% of budgetPartnership for ReNEWaL — $30,000 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetTHOMAS HEYWARD ACADEMY INC — $22,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN — $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLET THERE BE MOM INC — $19,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CANCER CONNECTION — $16,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE FRAZEE CENTER — $16,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $6,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES — $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRIUNE MERCY CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $4,160 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FAMILY EFFECT — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF GREENVILLE — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CANCER SURVIVORS PARK ALLIANCE
  • Who funds CHALLENGE TO CONQUER CANCER
  • Who funds Partnership for ReNEWaL
  • Who funds THOMAS HEYWARD ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds MEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN
  • Who funds LET THERE BE MOM INC
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CANCER CONNECTION
  • Who funds THE FRAZEE CENTER
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC
  • Who funds TRIUNE MERCY CENTER
  • Who funds UNITED HOUSING CONNECTIONS
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds THE FAMILY EFFECT
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds YMCA OF GREENVILLE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Scsymmes FoundationMO22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Scsymmes Foundation · Dabo's All in Team Foundation · Yeargin Foundation · Daniel-Mickel Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · W W Burgiss Charities Inc · John I Smith Charities Inc · United Way of Greenville County Inc · Don Waggoner & Zelma Waggoner Foundation · Jean T and Heyward G Pelham Foundation · Prisma Health-Upstate · The Jolley Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stephen D Mitchell Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph