Skip to content
Steinkaramansa Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Steinkaramansa Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$87k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$226kHuman Services$155kHealth$141kFood & Nutrition$72kPhilanthropy$52kScience & Tech$31kRecreation & Sports$11kArts & Culture$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $66k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AZ HOUSE FOUNDATION$28,000
EZER MIZION$20,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL$18,000
JGIVES FRIENDS OF ASOR FUND USA INC$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV UNIVERISTY$5,000
THE BALANCE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$2,500
BRONX LACROSSE$2,500
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 79% of grant dollars ($557k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 21% that went abroad ($149k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%LIFE'S DOOR INC: $6k → 20%ZAKA SEARCH AND RESCUE: $5k → 10%LIFE'S DOOR INC: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
WV
DC
FL

Beyond the US: 21% of all-years giving ($149k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Israel$149k · 7 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$608k · 13 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
12

Total granted

$608k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+209%

Still filing today

77%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $64k · revenue +169%
  • AG
    AMERICA GIVES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $46k · revenue +297%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    9× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • RU
    ROWAN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +252%
  • Z
    ZAKA
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Israel Medical Fund Corp

To provide guidance and support to families with ill or physically disabled family members

Human Services
2
Israel Healthcare Foundation Inc

To assist israelis, by providing grants to hospitals and clinics in israel.

Health
3
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

—
4
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
5
American Friends of Israel Emergency Aid Fund

To provide funding for medical and humanitarian projects throughout israel. the organization might make grants to other organizations providing such services, including, but not limited to, evp israel and israel emergency aid fund, israeli…

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Ziv Partners Inc

Raise funds in support of ziv medical center, which delivers trauma care, advanced mental health treatment, and inclusive healing to israels most diverse and at-risk communities.

Health
7
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
8
Ohr Meir Ubracha

The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.

Philanthropy
9
The Haron Dahan Fund for Bar-Ilan University in Israel

The fund's primary exempt mission is to solicit grants and contributions to support the educational mission of the bar-ilan university's azrieli faculty of medicine in the galilee.

Education
10
The Shalem Foundation

To promote and foster the creation of a zionist intellectual infrastructure for the state of israel, the development of a jewish national culture, and the establishment and promotion of intellectual and economic liberty.

Crime & Legal
11
Friends of Barzilai

To promote health by raising funds to support the health services, research, and equipment needs of, and to educate the public about, barzilai medical center in ashkelon, israel.

Health
12
American Friends of Herzog Hospital Inc

The organization was formed to provide financial support to fund services, capital projects, clinical research, and purchase of new equipment for herzog hospital in jerusalem, which is the 3rd largest hospital in jerusalem and is israel's…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pef Israel Endowment Funds Inc; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HADASSAH MEDICAL RELIEF ASSOCIATION INC: $192,500 · InternationalHADASSAH MEDICAL RELIEF ASSOCIATION INCEZER MIZION: $82,250 · InternationalEZER MIZIONAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $31,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF …+2 more: $5,500 · InternationalAZ HOUSE FOUNDATION: $148,500 · OtherAZ HOUSE FOUNDATIONAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV UNIVERISTY: $19,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV UNIV…THE BALANCE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION: $8,250 · OtherROWAN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE: $7,000 · Other+10 more: $27,250 · Other+10 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $63,500 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS …AMERICA GIVES INC: $46,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICA GIVES INC+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyAZ HOUSE FOUNDATION: $28,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $12,200 · HealthFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $2,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthLIFE'S DOOR INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesIsrael Magen Fund Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesBRONX LACROSSE INC CO OTA: $10,500 · Recreation & SportsTHE PANTRY PLUS MORE INC: $8,000 · Food & Nutrition
International$311,250Other$210,000Philanthropy$110,000Health$43,200Human Services$12,500Recreation & Sports$10,500Food & Nutrition$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHADASSAH MEDICAL RELIEF ASSOCIATION INC: $192,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEZER MIZION: $82,250 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $63,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC: $46,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $31,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAZ HOUSE FOUNDATION: $28,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $12,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBRONX LACROSSE INC CO OTA: $10,500 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetTHE PANTRY PLUS MORE INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLIFE'S DOOR INC: $7,500 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAdi Israel Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundVanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Jewish Communal FundNY12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Steinkaramansa Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Steinkaramansa Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Steinkaramansa’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home