Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stein-Gelberg Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$250kHealth$90kPublic Benefit$73kInternational$53kArts & Culture$42kCivil Rights$35kPublic Safety & Disaster$23kAnimals$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $65k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION$25,008
PROPUBLICA$10,000
NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$10,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BOARDERS$10,000
WALNUT STREET THEATRE$5,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH CENTRAL FLORIDA$2,500
HETRICK MARTIN INSTITUTE$2,500
CARSON SPRINGS WILDLIFE CONSERVATION$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA: $10k → 14%NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA: $10k → 14%NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA: $5k → 14%HETRICK MARTIN INSTITUTE: $3k → 17%NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA: $5k → 14%NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$553k · 12 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
9

Total granted

$553k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+14%

Still filing today

67%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureAnimalsHealthHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $250k · revenue +75%
  • UA
    UNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $53k · revenue +42%
  • PRO PUBLICA INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $34k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • AS
    AUTISM SPEAKS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue -38%
  • PH
    Pet Haven Rescue Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -92%
  • AF
    AMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE INC F/K/A FLA IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
2
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
3
Loving All Animals Inc

To maximize programs intended to stop killing of adoptable animals.

Philanthropy
4
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
5
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
6
Animal Equality

Animal equality is an international organization working with society, governments, and companies to end cruelty to farmed animals.

Animals
7
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
8
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
9
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
10
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
11
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
12
Spca Inc

Spca florida exists to eliminate animal suffering and to engage the entire community in the welfare and well-being of animals.we accomplish this by advancing model programs to promote the adoption of healthy animals, prevent dog and cat…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pro Publica Inc and the most unlike its peers is Carson Springs Wildlife Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $250,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INCUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA LAW SCHOOL FD — $73,050 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA LAW SCHOOL FDUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC — $52,760 · OtherUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $36,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODDOCTORS WITHOUT BOARDERS — $25,000 · OtherDOCTORS WITHOUT BOARDERSCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $11,000 · Other+8 more — $14,100 · Other+8 morePRO PUBLICA INC — $33,500 · Arts & CultureWALNUT STREET THEATRE CORPORATION — $5,000 · Arts & CultureNORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC — $3,750 · Arts & CultureREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL — $32,500 · Human ServicesTHE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $22,500 · InternationalAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $9,000 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $7,950 · HealthHorses Without Humans Rescue Organization — $5,100 · AnimalsCarson Springs Wildlife Foundation — $2,500 · AnimalsAlachua County Humane Society Inc — $2,500 · Animals
Education$250,000Other$211,910Arts & Culture$42,250Human Services$35,000International$22,500Health$16,950Animals$10,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $250,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC — $52,760 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC — $33,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL — $32,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $22,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $7,950 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHorses Without Humans Rescue Organization — $5,100 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetWALNUT STREET THEATRE CORPORATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC — $3,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCarson Springs Wildlife Foundation — $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE INC F/K/A FLA IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlachua County Humane Society Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSALLY WILKEY FOUNDATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stein-Gelberg Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph