Skip to content
Stein-Gelberg Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Stein-Gelberg Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$250kHealth$90kPublic Benefit$73kInternational$53kArts & Culture$42kCivil Rights$35kPublic Safety & Disaster$23kAnimals$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $65k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION$25,008
DOCTORS WITHOUT BOARDERS$10,000
PROPUBLICA$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$10,000
NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA$10,000
WALNUT STREET THEATRE$5,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH CENTRAL FLORIDA$2,500
HETRICK MARTIN INSTITUTE$2,500
CARSON SPRINGS WILDLIFE CONSERVATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA: $10k → 14%NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA: $10k → 14%NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA: $5k → 14%HETRICK MARTIN INSTITUTE: $3k → 17%NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA: $5k → 14%NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$553k · 12 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
9

Total granted

$553k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+14%

Still filing today

67%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureAnimalsHealthHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $250k · revenue +75%
  • UA
    UNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $53k · revenue +42%
  • PRO PUBLICA INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $34k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • AS
    AUTISM SPEAKS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue -38%
  • PH
    Pet Haven Rescue Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -92%
  • LY
    LGBTQ YOUTH GROUP NYC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
2
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
3
Loving All Animals Inc

To maximize programs intended to stop killing of adoptable animals.

Philanthropy
4
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
5
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
6
Animal Equality

Animal equality is an international organization working with society, governments, and companies to end cruelty to farmed animals.

Animals
7
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
8
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
9
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
10
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
11
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
12
Spca Inc

Spca florida exists to eliminate animal suffering and to engage the entire community in the welfare and well-being of animals.we accomplish this by advancing model programs to promote the adoption of healthy animals, prevent dog and cat…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pro Publica Inc; the most unlike its peers is Carson Springs Wildlife Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INCUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA LAW SCHOOL FD: $73,050 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA LAW SCHOOL FDUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC: $52,760 · OtherUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $36,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODDOCTORS WITHOUT BOARDERS: $25,000 · OtherDOCTORS WITHOUT BOARDERSCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $11,000 · Other+8 more: $14,100 · Other+8 morePRO PUBLICA INC: $33,500 · Arts & CultureWALNUT STREET THEATRE CORPORATION: $5,000 · Arts & CultureNORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $3,750 · Arts & CultureREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $32,500 · Human ServicesTHE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $22,500 · InternationalAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $9,000 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $7,950 · HealthHorses Without Humans Rescue Organization: $5,100 · AnimalsCarson Springs Wildlife Foundation: $2,500 · AnimalsAlachua County Humane Society Inc: $2,500 · Animals
Education$250,000Other$211,910Arts & Culture$42,250Human Services$35,000International$22,500Health$16,950Animals$10,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC: $52,760 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $33,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $32,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $22,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $7,950 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHorses Without Humans Rescue Organization: $5,100 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetWALNUT STREET THEATRE CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC: $3,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCarson Springs Wildlife Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE INC F/K/A FLA IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlachua County Humane Society Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSALLY WILKEY FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stein-Gelberg Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stein-Gelberg Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stein-Gelberg’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home