Skip to content
Stationary Engineers Industry Stabilization Fund Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Stationary Engineers Industry Stabilization Fund Inc

To improve labor-management relationships, job security, competitiveness, productivity, organizational effectiveness, and economic development.

$206k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$247kEnvironment$105kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kEmployment$66kReligion$33kHealth$30kMembership Benefit$20kHuman Services$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $15,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $205,840 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $190,340 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHEASTERN STATES CONFERENCE OF IUOE$10,000
HOLY RESURRECTION GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CLIMATE JOBS NY: $50k → 17%CLIMATE JOBS NY INC: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$547k · 7 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$547k
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+1%

Still filing today

86%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHealthEmploymentHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    ENGINEERS CHARITABLE TRUST
    9× · 2017–2025 · $247k · revenue +34% · 70% of their budget
  • CJ
    CLIMATE JOBS NY INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $75k · revenue +616% · 39% of their budget
  • IU
    INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPER ENG LOCAL 30 APPRENTICE TRAIN & SKILL IMPROVEMENT FD
    8× · 2017–2025 · $48k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • OP
    OUTREACH PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +1%
  • IU
    INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEE LCL UN 1515A15B15C15D15G15H AFL-CIgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue +34%
  • MARCH OF DIMES INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Union of Operating Enginee Local Union 450 Appreticeship Training

The trust was established to provide apprenticeship and journeyman training, testing, education, job skill development and enhancement for the operating engineer trades.

Employment
2
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 624

The organization is a trade union that represents operating engineers, who work as heavy equipment operators, mechanics,and surveyors in the construction industry, and stationary engineers, who work in operations and maintenance in…

—
3
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 571 Training Fund

Training and education of operating engineers.

Education
4
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 94

The objectives of the union, as the representative of its members, are to improve working conditions and living standards of members through collective bargaining, education, training and employee benefits and to establish necessary…

—
5
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 877

The objectives of the union, as the representative of its members, are to improve working conditions and living standards of members through collective bargaining, education, training and employee benefits and to establish necessary…

—
6
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 98

The objectives of the union as the representative of its members, are to improve working conditions and living standards of members through collective bargaining, education, training and employee benefits and to establish necessary…

—
7
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 4

The union improves working conditions and living standards of members through collective bargaining, education, training and employee benefits and establishes necessary procedures for the amicable adjustment of all disputes which may arise…

—
8
International Union of Operating Engineers' Local 324

To anticipate for, and capitalize on the ever-changing economic, social, political and legal challenges facing our union; to provide an unmatched level of services to members through a dedicated, loyal team of professionals.

—
9
Upstate New York Operating Engineers Local Union No 158

The objectives of the union as the representative of its members, are to improve working conditions and living standards of members through collective bargaining, education, training and employee benefits and to establish necessary…

—
10
International Union of Operating Engineers Local No 3

To organize workers for their economic and social advancement.

—
11
Int'l Union of Operating Engnrs Jt Apprentshptrain & Safety of E Pa & De

To provide for apprenticeship and training opportunities and for safety in the trade; to train apprentices and journeymen who are now in the trade; to assist in providing training that will equip apprentices and journeymen for profitable…

—
12
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 428

The organization is a labor union, organized under an International Charter, to provide and promote benefits for its members and represent them in labor negotiations and contract issues.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Union of Oper Eng Local 30 Apprentice Train & Skill Improvement Fd; the most unlike its peers is Jtm Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ENGINEERS CHARITABLE TRUST: $246,539 · PhilanthropyENGINEERS CHARITABLE TRUST+1 more: $5,500 · PhilanthropyINTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPER ENG LOCAL 30 APPRENTICE TRAIN & SKILL IMPROVEMENT FD: $47,796 · OtherINTERNATIONAL UNION OF …HOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES OF ADONAI: $27,500 · OtherHOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES O…NORTHEASTERN STATES CONFERENCE OF IUOE: $20,000 · OtherNORTHEASTERN STATES CON…INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEE LCL UN 1515A15B15C15D15G15H AFL-CI: $12,909 · OtherINTERNATIONAL UNION OF …The Ministry for Hope Inc: $10,000 · OtherThe Ministry for Hope I…BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION TRADE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER & PUTNAM COUNTIES: $5,600 · OtherHOLY RESURRECTION GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH: $5,500 · OtherOPERATING ENGINEERS NATIONAL CHARITY FUND: $100,000 · EmploymentOPERATING ENGINEER…CLIMATE JOBS NY INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesCLIMATE JOBS …CLIMATE JOBS NY EDUCATION FUND INC: $30,000 · EnvironmentOUTREACH PROJECT INC: $20,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $10,000 · Health
Philanthropy$252,039Other$129,305Employment$100,000Human Services$75,000Environment$30,000Health$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetENGINEERS CHARITABLE TRUST: $246,539 over 9y, 70% of budgetOPERATING ENGINEERS NATIONAL CHARITY FUND: $100,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetCLIMATE JOBS NY INC: $75,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetINTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPER ENG LOCAL 30 APPRENTICE TRAIN & SKILL IMPROVEMENT FD: $47,796 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetCLIMATE JOBS NY EDUCATION FUND INC: $30,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetNORTHEASTERN STATES CONFERENCE OF IUOE: $20,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetOUTREACH PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEE LCL UN 1515A15B15C15D15G15H AFL-CI: $12,909 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ministry for Hope Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBUILDING & CONSTRUCTION TRADE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER & PUTNAM COUNTIES: $5,600 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetJTM FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 1y, 22% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stationary Engineers Industry Stabilization Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stationary Engineers Industry Stabilization Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stationary Engineers Industry Stabilization Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Stationary Engineers Industry Stabilization Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stationary Engineers Industry Stabilization’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home