· Public charity
Stationary Engineers Industry Stabilization Fund Inc
To improve labor-management relationships, job security, competitiveness, productivity, organizational effectiveness, and economic development.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $15,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $205,840 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $190,340 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTHEASTERN STATES CONFERENCE OF IUOE | $10,000 |
| HOLY RESURRECTION GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–20, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ECENGINEERS CHARITABLE TRUST9× · 2017–2025 · $247k · revenue +34% · 70% of their budget
- CJCLIMATE JOBS NY INC2× · 2018–2020 · $75k · revenue +616% · 39% of their budget
- IUINTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPER ENG LOCAL 30 APPRENTICE TRAIN & SKILL IMPROVEMENT FD8× · 2017–2025 · $48k · revenue +98%
Funded once
- OPOUTREACH PROJECT INCone grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +1%
- IUINTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEE LCL UN 1515A15B15C15D15G15H AFL-CIgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue +34%
MARCH OF DIMES INCone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -35%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The trust was established to provide apprenticeship and journeyman training, testing, education, job skill development and enhancement for the operating engineer trades.
The organization is a trade union that represents operating engineers, who work as heavy equipment operators, mechanics,and surveyors in the construction industry, and stationary engineers, who work in operations and maintenance in…
Training and education of operating engineers.
The objectives of the union, as the representative of its members, are to improve working conditions and living standards of members through collective bargaining, education, training and employee benefits and to establish necessary…
The objectives of the union, as the representative of its members, are to improve working conditions and living standards of members through collective bargaining, education, training and employee benefits and to establish necessary…
The objectives of the union as the representative of its members, are to improve working conditions and living standards of members through collective bargaining, education, training and employee benefits and to establish necessary…
The union improves working conditions and living standards of members through collective bargaining, education, training and employee benefits and establishes necessary procedures for the amicable adjustment of all disputes which may arise…
To anticipate for, and capitalize on the ever-changing economic, social, political and legal challenges facing our union; to provide an unmatched level of services to members through a dedicated, loyal team of professionals.
The objectives of the union as the representative of its members, are to improve working conditions and living standards of members through collective bargaining, education, training and employee benefits and to establish necessary…
To organize workers for their economic and social advancement.
To provide for apprenticeship and training opportunities and for safety in the trade; to train apprentices and journeymen who are now in the trade; to assist in providing training that will equip apprentices and journeymen for profitable…
The organization is a labor union, organized under an International Charter, to provide and promote benefits for its members and represent them in labor negotiations and contract issues.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Union of Oper Eng Local 30 Apprentice Train & Skill Improvement Fd and the most unlike its peers is Jtm Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ENGINEERS CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
- Who funds OPERATING ENGINEERS NATIONAL CHARITY FUND ↗
- Who funds CLIMATE JOBS NY INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPER ENG LOCAL 30 APPRENTICE TRAIN & SKILL IMPROVEMENT FD ↗
- Who funds CLIMATE JOBS NY EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEASTERN STATES CONFERENCE OF IUOE ↗
- Who funds OUTREACH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEE LCL UN 1515A15B15C15D15G15H AFL-CI ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds The Ministry for Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION TRADE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER & PUTNAM COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds JTM FOUNDATION ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stationary Engineers Industry Stabilization Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Stationary Engineers Industry Stabilization Fund Inc?
Find your warmest path to Stationary Engineers Industry Stabilization Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.