How much did STAN & MADELLE ROSENFELD grant in FY2023?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of STAN & MADELLE ROSENFELD’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

san

2019

—

2020

san

2021

san

2022

youthsan

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k6 grants · $14k
$10k–50k2 grants · $26k

$4,140

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

OREGON JEWISH MUSEUM AND CENTER FOR HOLOCAUST EDUCATION$16,360
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PORTLAND$10,000
BELOVED BUILDERS$5,000
CONGREGATION SHAARIE TORAH$4,140
FRIENDLY HOUSE INC$2,500
JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILD SERVICES$1,000
OREGON JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION YOUTH$1,000
BNAI BRITH MENS CAMP$540

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$612k · 27 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 20 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$612k

$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%

+12%

Still filing today

48%

20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationArts & CultureCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

OJ
OREGON JEWISH MUSEUM AND CENTER FOR HOLOCAUST EDUCATION
3× · 2021–2023 · $148k · revenue +22%
FRIENDLY HOUSE INC
7× · 2017–2023 · $68k · revenue +15%
JF
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PORTLAND
7× · 2017–2023 · $65k · revenue +215%

Funded once

CP
COLAB PDX
one grant, 2022 · $5k
BH
BLANCHET HOUSE
one grant, 2022 · $1k
YV
YOUTH VILLAGES OREGON
one grant, 2022 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

LArche Portland

At l'arche portland people with and without developmental disabilities create home and build community together. we nurture long-term mutual relationships that reveal the gifts of people with developmental disabilities. in doing so we…

Human Services

Portland Public Library

Portland Public Library is a welcoming cultural center that brings people together and connects them with trusted resources, ideas, experiences, and information. We build a stronger community by inspiring learning, creativity, and…

Education

Portland Jobs With Justice Education

We are a coalition that connects community and labor.

Employment

Peninsula Jewish Community Center

We positively impact people's lives, fostering belonging and meaningful connections with a diverse community, grounded in jewish values and traditions

Human Services

Portland Community Reinvestment

Preserve, expand, and manage affordable housing in the city of portland and provide access to and advocacy services for our residents. continued on schedule o.

Unclassified

Holocaust Center for Humanity

The Holocaust Center for Humanity teaches the lessons of the Holocaust, inspiring students of all ages to confront bigotry and indifference, promote human dignity, and take action.

—

Beacon Village

Beacon Village provides compassionate and supportive shelter for unhoused individuals ready to transform their lives and establish roots in their community.

Human Services

Portland Collective Housing

Portland Collective Housing is a volunteer run public benefit corporation formed to provide low income housing for people of low to moderate income.

Housing & Shelter

City Club of Portland

To inform its members and the community in public matters and to arouse in them the realization of the obligations of citizenship.

Community Improvement

The Portland Playhouse

Production of quality, intimate performances in which artists/audience interaction is paramount.

Arts & Culture

New Haven Jewish Community Council

We are a warm and vibrant senior community, infused with jewish values, where people live their best lives.

—

Phoenix Jewish Community

Operation of assisted living facilities

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Path Home and the most unlike its peers is Jewish Federation of Greater Portland. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

16/17

Grantees still filing

15/17

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$283,850Arts & Culture$148,360Human Services$89,875Philanthropy$64,800Education$34,008Health$3,000Housing & Shelter$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

OCF Joseph E Weston Public FoundationOR30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Oregon Jewish Community Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Collins Foundation · Juan Young Trust · The Autzen Foundation · The Holzman Foundation · Rose E Tucker Charitable Trust · The Jackson Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation STAN & MADELLE ROSENFELD funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: OREGON JEWISH MUSEUM AND CENTER FOR HOLOCAUST EDUCATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~25 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 943113745 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on OREGON JEWISH MUSEUM AND CENTER FOR HOLOCAUST EDUCATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 25 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 6% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Stan & Madelle Rosenfeld?

Find your warmest path to Stan & Madelle Rosenfeld through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

STAN & MADELLE ROSENFELD

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Stan & Madelle Rosenfeld?

More from the funding graph

STAN & MADELLE ROSENFELD

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Stan & Madelle Rosenfeld?

More from the funding graph