Loading…
· Public charity
ST PETER'S HEALTH PARTNERS
To provide health care system management and support
$167k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants
1
Communities
$80k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.
Youth Development$568kHousing & Shelter$122kHealth$47kFood & Nutrition$40kEducation$16kOther$22k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
—
2021
—
2022
food
2023
albany
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 6 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- $10k–50k5 grants · $87k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$169M
Total assets
Largest grants
- TROY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC$80,000
- INTERFAITH PARTNERSHIP FOR THE HOMELESS$40,000
- HEALTHY CAPITAL DIST INITIATIVE$15,000
- ALBANY PATROONS INC$12,000
- REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NE NY$10,000
- TRI CITY VALLEY CATS INC$10,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$720k · 4 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +613% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
4
4
Total granted
$720k
$73k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+613%
+18%
Still filing today
100%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Youth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterHealthFood & NutritionEducationOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TBTROY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC6× · 2018–2023 · $468k · revenue +706%
- IPINTERFAITH PARTNERSHIP FOR THE HOMELESS INC4× · 2018–2023 · $112k · revenue +129%
- RFREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NE NY3× · 2020–2023 · $40k · revenue +613%
Funded once
- AHAMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC2× · 2018–2019 · $30k · revenue +14%
- SPST PETER'S HOSPITALone grant, 2018 · $17k · revenue +18%
- ACALBANY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY AND HEALTH SCIENCESone grant, 2022 · $16k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic
Advancing health through research, education, clinical practice, and community partnerships; providing each person the best care in the right place, at the right time, every time.
Health
2
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation
Central maine healthcare corporation supports its affiliated healthcare institutions in order for these entities to provide exceptional healthcare services.
Health
3
International Community Health Services
Provide health services to improve the health of asian pacific islander and other communities.
Health
4
One Community Health
To advance health and social justice for all members of our community.
—
5
Tri-Cities Community Health
Deliver the highest quality health care to every person, every time.
—
6
Union Hospital Inc
We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.
Health
7
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc
Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…
Membership Benefit
8
Augustana College
Offer a challenging education that develops the qualities of mind, spirit and body for students.
Education
9
Institute for Public Health Innovation
Iphi develops multi-sector partnerships and innovative solutions to improve the public's health and well-being across maryland, virginia and the district of columbia. our work strengthens health systems and policy, enhances conditions that…
Human Services
10
National Committee for Quality Assurance
Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: to transform health care quality through measurement, transparency and accountability.
Health
11
Physician Affiliate Group of New York Pc
To offer responsive and quality healthcare to the new york community while fulfilling the educational and entrepreneurial needs of our members.
Health
12
Alliance Health Centers Inc
Impacting our community by providing access to high quality, affordable care.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Equinox Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Peter's Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Youth Development$568,176Housing & Shelter$122,000Health$46,995Food & Nutrition$40,000Other$22,000Education$15,930
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TROY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH PARTNERSHIP FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY CAPITAL DISTRICT INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NE NY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST PETER'S HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds ALBANY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY AND HEALTH SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds EQUINOX INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Community Foundation for the GreaterNY13.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for the Greater · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation ST PETER'S HEALTH PARTNERS funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: TROY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~5 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 8.1× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 141338574 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on TROY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 7% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to St Peter's Health Partners?
Find your warmest path to St Peter's Health Partners through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines