Skip to content
St Mary's Medical Center Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

St Mary's Medical Center Foundation

The foundation will not only provide long-term financial support for sustaining and enhancing st.

$6.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5.7M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.8MHuman Services$118kYouth Development$24kFood & Nutrition$20kArts & Culture$15kPhilanthropy$15k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $5,703,492, the rows itemized in this filing. The $6,418,807 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $715,315 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$5,703,492
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER$5,703,492
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $113k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Huntington YMCA: $50k → 19%HUNTINGTON YMCA: $38k → 19%HUNTINGTON YMCA: $25k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 73% of St Mary's Medical Center Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in WV; by stated purpose, 27%.

St Mary's Medical Center Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.7M · 7 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +53% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$8.7M
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+53%

Still filing today

86%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    ST MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $8.4M · revenue +83%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION (7015)
    3× · 2017–2019 · $113k · revenue +22%
  • TR
    THE RECOVERY POINT OF HUNTINGTON INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • AT
    AUXILIARY TO ST MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • FA
    FAITHHEALTH APPALACHIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $12k · revenue +567%
  • PI
    PROACT INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -96%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cabell Huntington Hospital Inc

To meet lifetime healthcare needs of those served. to provide the highest level of service, quality, and efficiency. to advance healthcare through education. our vision is to be the hospital of choice for the communities we serve.

Health
2
The Huntington Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Northern Virginia Health Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Richmond Memorial Health Foundation
Health
5
The Huntington-Akron Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Hunt Family Foundation
—
7
The Hunt Family Foundation
—
8
Montana Healthcare Foundation
Philanthropy
9
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
10
Adventist Healthcare Inc

We extend god's care through the ministry of physical, mental and spiritual healing.

—
11
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

—
12
Rocky Mountain Health Foundation
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cabell Huntington Hospital Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Foster Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER INC: $8,397,614 · OtherST MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER INC+3 more: $44,112 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION (7015): $112,538 · Human ServicesCABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $21,833 · HealthFAITHHEALTH APPALACHIA INC: $12,000 · HealthPROACT INC: $10,000 · HealthHERITAGE FARM FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyTHE RECOVERY POINT OF HUNTINGTON INC: $30,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$8,441,726Human Services$112,538Health$68,833Philanthropy$50,000Housing & Shelter$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER INC: $8,397,614 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION (7015): $112,538 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetHERITAGE FARM FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTHE RECOVERY POINT OF HUNTINGTON INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCABELL HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $21,833 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROACT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFOSTER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

St Mary's Medical Cen…
St Mary's Medical Center IncWV13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Mary's Medical Center Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St Mary's Medical Center Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St Mary's Medical Center Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on St Mary's Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home