Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

St Faith's House Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
43
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$3.0MYouth Development$986kEducation$960kHealth$845kHousing & Shelter$638kEnvironment$360kArts & Culture$339kCrime & Legal$313kOther$0
02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k39 grants · $950k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOIS BRONZ CHILDRENS CENTER$75,000
THE BRIDGE FUND OF WESTCHESTER$50,000
OPEN DOOR FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER$45,000
FAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY OF YONKERS$45,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MOUNT VERNON$40,000
GROUNDWORK HUDSON VALLEY$40,000
RSHM LIFE CENTER$35,000
YMCA OF CENTRAL & NORTHERN WESTCHESTER$35,000
THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE$35,000
OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER$35,000
LATINO U COLLEGE$30,000
WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$30,000
PROJECT MORRY$30,000
ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER$30,000
MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER: $20k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $35k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $30k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $30k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $30k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $30k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $20k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $20k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $20k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $20k → 9%YOUTH SHELTER PROGRAM OF WESTCHESTER: $25k → 9%OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER: $40k → 9%OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER: $35k → 9%OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER: $35k → 9%OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER: $35k → 9%OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER: $35k → 9%OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER: $30k → 9%OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER: $30k → 9%OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER: $30k → 9%OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER: $25k → 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER: $35k → 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER: $30k → 9%EL CENTRO HISPANO INC: $25k → 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER: $30k → 9%EL CENTRO HISPANO INC: $25k → 9%EL CENTRO HISPANO INC: $23k → 9%EL CENTRO HISPANO INC: $23k → 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER: $30k → 9%EL CENTRO HISPANO INC: $23k → 9%EL CENTRO HISPANO INC: $23k → 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER: $30k → 9%EL CENTRO HISPANO INC: $20k → 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER: $30k → 9%EL CENTRO HISPANO INC: $20k → 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER: $25k → 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER: $25k → 9%ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER: $25k → 9%FAMILY YMCA AT TARRYTOWN: $20k → 9%FAMILY YMCA AT TARRYTOWN: $20k → 9%FAMILY YMCA AT TARRYTOWN: $20k → 9%FAMILY YMCA AT TARRYTOWN: $20k → 9%MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER: $30k → 9%MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER: $25k → 9%MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER: $25k → 9%MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER: $25k → 9%MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER: $25k → 9%MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER: $25k → 9%FAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY OF YONKERS: $45k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.6M · 61 repeat orgs$355k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

61 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

61
13

Total granted

$7.6M
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
0%

Still filing today

66%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $205k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MOUNT VERNON INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $320k · revenue +76%
  • OC
    OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $295k · revenue +128%
  • RL
    RSHM Life Center
    9× · 2017–2025 · $290k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF MOUNT KISCO
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • ND
    NUNATAK'S dba GREENBURGH NATURE CEN
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • WC
    WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNA
    one grant, 2024 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Westchester Community Opportunity Program Inc

To mobilize and efficiently manage resources through partnerships and collaborations to help the low-income and at-risk populations in the hudson valley region to achieve greater self-sufficiency.

Community Improvement
2
Westchester School for Special Children

To provide services to children and adolescents with developmental disabilities. the school runs preschool and school age programs.

—
3
Mid-Island Y Jewish Community Center in

Provide vital services & foster jewish identity, personal growth, family strength and community. the mid-island y jcc is open to everyone in the community serving individuals of all ages, abilities, and challenges.

Human Services
4
Jewish Community Center of Greater Rochester Inc

The louis s. wolk jcc of greater rochester is deeply rooted in and committed to celebrating jewish traditions and values. we welcome the community at large to join together for exceptional events and activities that establish lifelong…

Human Services
5
Jewish Community Center of Schenectady Inc

Our mission is to build a vibrant, welcoming, and inclusive community that embraces our jewish values, culture, identity and connections to israel, engages the local community, and enhances the body, mind and spirit of our members.

Religion
6
Jcc of Mid-Westchester Nursery School

The jcc nursery school of mid-westchester, inc. is a non-profit organization dedicated to enriching the community by providing educational programs to children of all backgrounds, and in addition, provides programs for special needs…

Human Services
7
Community Programs of Westchester Jewish Community Services

Community programs of westchester jewish community services is a non- secretarian, not-for-profit, broad based human service agency dedicated to helping people of all ages cope with emotional, cognitive, environmental, physical, social and…

—
8
Julia Dyckman Andrus Memorial Inc

Through our proven care models, innovative programs, professional training, influential research and determined advocacy, andrus aims to be a national leader in shaping policies and practices that prevent and overcome the effect of…

Unclassified
9
Westchester Independent Living Center Inc

Westchester independent living center ("the center") is the leading community advocate, dedicated to improving the quality of life of people with disabiliities by promoting individual self determination and human rights, societal change…

Human Services
10
Children's Day Treatment Center & School Inc

West end day school is more than a school - it is a community of students, staff, and parents who have a shared vision. we create a safe haven for learning, strive to be a trusted partner for parents, and foster the development of…

Health
11
White Plains Childrens Center Inc

A developmental day care center providing care for special needs and non-special needs children.

—
12
The County Chamber of Commerce

The business council of westchester's mission is to work hard to grow the economy, create jobs and build a strong business community in westchester county.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth Shelter Program of Westchester Inc and the most unlike its peers is Untermyer Gardens Conservancy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDisability & Mental Health …Professional Associations &…Community Arts EducationChild-Focused Health & Welf…Regional Healthcare SystemsVulnerable Population Suppo…Early Childhood Care Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 50 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr19%18%20–35yr12%29%35–55yr18%41%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr19%19%20–35yr12%29%35–55yr18%48%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/52
the rest of the field
11%
695/6,519

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/50
Grantees still filing
36/50
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MOUNT VERNON INC — $320,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MOUNT VERNON INCRSHM Life Center — $290,000 · OtherRSHM Life CenterFAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INC — $270,000 · OtherFAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INCCLUSTER COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $265,000 · OtherCLUSTER COMMUNITY SERVICES INCYMCA OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN WESTCH — $210,000 · OtherTHE BRIDGE FUND OF WESTCHESTER — $210,000 · OtherPROJECT MORRY — $205,000 · OtherLOIS BRONZ CHILDRENS CENTER — $180,000 · OtherYWCA OF WHITE PLAINS CENTRAL WESTCH — $155,000 · OtherNUNATAKS LTD D/B/A GREENBURGH NATURE CENTER — $175,000 · Other+40 more — $2,312,906 · Other+40 moreOSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $295,000 · Human ServicesOSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTE…ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER — $260,000 · Human ServicesELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CA…THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC — $235,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE IN…MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER — $210,000 · Human ServicesMOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CE…EL CENTRO HISPANO INC — $197,000 · Human ServicesEL CENTRO HISPANO INCNEW BEGINNINGS OF WESTCHESTER INC — $155,000 · Human ServicesNEW BEGINNINGS OF WESTCHE…FAMILY YMCA at TARRYTOWN — $126,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY YMCA at TARRYTOWNPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC — $105,000 · Human ServicesPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTE…FAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY OF YONKERS — $75,000 · Human Services+4 more — $154,000 · Human Services+4 moreOPEN DOOR FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER INC — $255,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC INC — $95,000 · HealthVISITING NURSE SERVICES IN WESTCHESTER INC — $15,000 · HealthWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $15,000 · HealthGROUNDWORK HUDSON VALLEY INC — $300,000 · PhilanthropyWESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · Philanthropy+2 more — $15,000 · PhilanthropyHUDSON RIVER MUSEUM OF WESTCHESTER — $95,000 · Arts & CultureCLAY ART CENTER INC — $58,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSIC CONSERVATORY OF WESTCHESTER INC — $58,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC HUDSON VALLEY — $50,000 · Arts & CultureSTEFFI NOSSEN DANCE FOUNDATION INC — $32,500 · Arts & CultureTHE SYMPHONY OF WESTCHESTER INC — $30,000 · Arts & CultureLIFTING UP WESTCHESTER INC — $173,000 · Housing & ShelterWesthab Inc — $100,000 · Housing & ShelterYONKERS PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC — $180,000 · EducationSTUDENT ADVOCACY INC — $45,000 · EducationLATINO U COLLEGE ACCESS INC — $25,000 · Education
Other$4,592,906Human Services$1,812,500Health$380,000Philanthropy$345,000Arts & Culture$323,500Housing & Shelter$273,000Education$250,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MOUNT VERNON INC — $320,000 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetGROUNDWORK HUDSON VALLEY INC — $300,000 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetOSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $295,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetRSHM Life Center — $290,000 over 9y, 6.8% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INC — $270,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER — $260,000 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetOPEN DOOR FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER INC — $255,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC — $235,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER — $210,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetEL CENTRO HISPANO INC — $197,000 over 9y, 6.0% of budgetYONKERS PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC — $180,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetNUNATAKS LTD D/B/A GREENBURGH NATURE CENTER — $175,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetLIFTING UP WESTCHESTER INC — $173,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS OF WESTCHESTER INC — $155,000 over 9y, 29% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER — $140,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTEATOWN LAKE RESERVATION INC — $135,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetFAMILY YMCA at TARRYTOWN — $126,500 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetUNTERMYER GARDENS CONSERVANCY INC — $115,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetMy Sisters Place Inc — $112,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHOPES DOOR INC — $111,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES OF THE HUDSON VALLEY — $107,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC — $105,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetWesthab Inc — $100,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHUDSON RIVER MUSEUM OF WESTCHESTER — $95,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC INC — $95,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGUIDANCE CENTER OF WESTCHESTER INC — $90,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSOMETHING GOOD IN THE WORLD INC — $90,000 over 9y, 27% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY OF YONKERS — $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INC — $59,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCLAY ART CENTER INC — $58,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetTHE MUSIC CONSERVATORY OF WESTCHESTER INC — $58,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHISTORIC HUDSON VALLEY — $50,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSTUDENT ADVOCACY INC — $45,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetPROVIDENCE HOUSE INC — $44,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetYMCA OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN WESTCHESTER NY INC — $35,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSTEFFI NOSSEN DANCE FOUNDATION INC — $32,500 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetLEXINGTON CENTER FOR RECOVERY INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SYMPHONY OF WESTCHESTER INC — $30,000 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetLATINO U COLLEGE ACCESS INC — $25,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetWESTCHESTER CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC — $25,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetYWCA WHITE PLAINS & CENTRAL WESTCHESTER INC AND ITS AFFILIATES — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVISITING NURSE SERVICES IN WESTCHESTER INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HUDSON VALLEY WRITERS' CENTER INC — $15,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JCK FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetJOHN A COLEMAN SCHOOL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN DOOR FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MOUNT VERNON INC ↗
  • Who funds GROUNDWORK HUDSON VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds RSHM Life Center ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETH MASCIA CHILD CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT KISCO CHILD CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EL CENTRO HISPANO INC ↗
  • Who funds YONKERS PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NUNATAKS LTD D/B/A GREENBURGH NATURE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LIFTING UP WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds TEATOWN LAKE RESERVATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY YMCA at TARRYTOWN ↗
  • Who funds UNTERMYER GARDENS CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds My Sisters Place Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOPES DOOR INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL SERVICES OF THE HUDSON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Westhab Inc ↗
  • Who funds HUDSON RIVER MUSEUM OF WESTCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD HUDSON PECONIC INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDANCE CENTER OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SOMETHING GOOD IN THE WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY OF YONKERS ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Thomas and Agnes …Pcsb Community Founda…The New York Communit…United Way of Westche…Pilzer Foundation IncMbia FoundationTd Charitable Foundat…The Lorraine O'Brien …Chapman Family Founda…Jewish Communal FundJandon FoundationPeoples United Commun…
The Thomas and Agnes Carvel FoundationNY48.9× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation · Pcsb Community Foundation · The New York Community Trust · United Way of Westchester and Putnam · Pilzer Foundation Inc · Mbia Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · The Lorraine O'Brien Foundation Inc · Chapman Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Jandon Foundation · Peoples United Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization St Faith's House Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to St Faith's House Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to St Faith's House Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines