Skip to content
St Barnabas Hospital at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

St Barnabas Hospital

St.

$821k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$6.2MCommunity Improvement$311kPhilanthropy$10kReligion$10kHuman Services$9kEducation$5k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $796,750, the rows itemized in this filing. The $820,704 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $23,954 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $250k+1 grant · $750k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$648M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Union Community Health Center$750,000
Kaplen JCC on the Palisades$10,000
United Hospital Fund$10,000
The Bronx Community Foundation$10,000
Regional Aid for Interim Needs Inc$8,500
Bronx Overall Economic Development Corp$8,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 28%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Regional Aid for Interim Needs Inc: $9k → 28%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.2M · 4 repeat orgs$309k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$6.2M
$291k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+25%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    UNION COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6.1M · revenue +31%
  • BO
    Bronx Overall Economic Development Corporation
    5× · 2017–2024 · $46k · revenue +182%
  • UH
    UNITED HOSPITAL FUND OF NEW YORK
    6× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue -7%

Funded once

  • BD
    Bronx Development Fund
    one grant, 2018 · $250k
  • BD
    BELMONT DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +11%
  • MM
    MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
BronxCare Health Integrated Services System Inc

The objective and mission of the corporation shall be to ensure the availability of funding to support the development, expansion and delivery of the highest quality effective and efficient primary care services, coupled with additional…

Health
2
BronxCare Special Care Center Inc

The mission of bronxcare special care center (bcscc) is to deliver quality, effective and efficient health care services to meet the health service needs of the residents of the bronx and to enhance its reputation as one of the community's…

Health
3
Bronx County Medical Society

Providing outstanding leadership in medicine by promoting excellence and innovation in clinical care, education, and public policy

Health
4
BronxCare Health Systems

To deliver the highest quality of healthcare services to the bronx community.

Health
5
Bronxcare New Directions Fund

To provide grants and scholarships to support not-for profit organizations including bronxcare health system.

Health
6
BronxCare Dr Martin Luther King JrHealth Center

To deliver comprehensive, quality and efficient primary and ambulatory health care services to address the health care needs of the residents of the south and central bronx, and of all the other communities we serve, and to enhance the…

—
7
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
8
Bronx Community Health Network

Bronx community health network's mission is to improve the health status of medically underserved communities; provide access to affordable, quality healthcare, especially for uninsured persons; obtain financial resources to support…

Employment
9
Bronx Rhio Inc

The bronx rhio's mission is to build, operate and maintain a secure, interoperable clinical health information exchange that makes it possible for patients' medical records to follow them wherever they go for health services. see schedule…

Public Benefit
10
Lenox Hill Hospital Medical Pc

Lenox hill hospital medical, pc is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Union Community Health Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is United Hospital Fund of New York. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNION COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $6,115,757 · HealthUNION COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC+4 more: $93,000 · HealthBronx Development Fund: $250,000 · OtherBronx Overall Economic Development Corporation: $46,200 · Other+1 more: $10,000 · OtherBELMONT DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Community ImprovementTHE BRONX COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyREGIONAL AID FOR INTERIM NEEDS INC: $8,500 · Human ServicesAAPI OF NEW YORK STATE INC: $5,000 · Education
Health$6,208,757Other$306,200Community Improvement$15,000Philanthropy$10,000Human Services$8,500Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNION COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $6,115,757 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetBronx Overall Economic Development Corporation: $46,200 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED HOSPITAL FUND OF NEW YORK: $40,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $32,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBELMONT DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRONX COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ON THE PALISADES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL AID FOR INTERIM NEEDS INC: $8,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPromesa Foundation Inc: $5,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAAPI OF NEW YORK STATE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Paypal Charitable Giv…
Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC8.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St Barnabas Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St Barnabas Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Jewish Community Center On the Palisades: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on St Barnabas Hospital’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home