· Public charity
St Barnabas Hospital
St.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $796,750 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $820,704 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $23,954 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
- $250k+1 grant · $750k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Union Community Health Center | $750,000 |
| Kaplen JCC on the Palisades | $10,000 |
| The Bronx Community Foundation | $10,000 |
| United Hospital Fund | $10,000 |
| Regional Aid for Interim Needs Inc | $8,500 |
| Bronx Overall Economic Development Corp | $8,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 28%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UCUNION COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC8× · 2017–2024 · $6.1M · revenue +31%
- BOBronx Overall Economic Development Corporation5× · 2017–2024 · $46k · revenue +182%
- UHUNITED HOSPITAL FUND OF NEW YORK6× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue -7%
Funded once
- BDBronx Development Fundone grant, 2018 · $250k
- BDBELMONT DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +11%
- MMMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +59%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The objective and mission of the corporation shall be to ensure the availability of funding to support the development, expansion and delivery of the highest quality effective and efficient primary care services, coupled with additional…
The mission of bronxcare special care center (bcscc) is to deliver quality, effective and efficient health care services to meet the health service needs of the residents of the bronx and to enhance its reputation as one of the community's…
Providing outstanding leadership in medicine by promoting excellence and innovation in clinical care, education, and public policy
To deliver the highest quality of healthcare services to the bronx community.
To provide grants and scholarships to support not-for profit organizations including bronxcare health system.
To deliver comprehensive, quality and efficient primary and ambulatory health care services to address the health care needs of the residents of the south and central bronx, and of all the other communities we serve, and to enhance the…
Bronx community health network's mission is to improve the health status of medically underserved communities; provide access to affordable, quality healthcare, especially for uninsured persons; obtain financial resources to support…
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
The bronx rhio's mission is to build, operate and maintain a secure, interoperable clinical health information exchange that makes it possible for patients' medical records to follow them wherever they go for health services. see schedule…
Lenox hill hospital medical, pc is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Union Community Health Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is United Hospital Fund of New York. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNION COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Bronx Overall Economic Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds UNITED HOSPITAL FUND OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds BELMONT DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE BRONX COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ON THE PALISADES ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL AID FOR INTERIM NEEDS INC ↗
- Who funds Promesa Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds AAPI OF NEW YORK STATE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization St Barnabas Hospital funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jewish Community Center On the Palisades — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.