· Private foundation
St and Margaret D Harris Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k31 grants · $598k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $321k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MERCER UNIVERSITY | $99,999 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME | $69,227 |
| BOSTON COLLEGE | $52,100 |
| GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| EAST COBB BAPTIST CHURCH | $50,000 |
| COLLECTIVE LEARNING ACADEMY | $49,636 |
| AUBURN UNIVERSITY | $39,387 |
| MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY | $34,706 |
| GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES | $30,000 |
| COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON | $29,769 |
| BERMAN CENTER | $27,750 |
| MURPHY-HARPST CHILDREN'S CENTER INC | $25,000 |
| CAMP TWIN LAKES | $25,000 |
| CLUBHOUSE ATLATNA INC | $25,000 |
| GEORGIA MOUNTAIN FOOD BANK | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $155k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
44 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $368k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Cure Childhood Cancer Inc4× · 2022–2025 · $95k · revenue +57%- MCMURPHY-HARPST CHILDREN'S CENTERS INC4× · 2022–2025 · $95k · revenue +67%
- CLCollective Learning Academy Inc2× · 2024–2025 · $92k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- CCCLARK'S CHRISTMAS KIDS (GADFCS)one grant, 2022 · $55k
- HFHOPE FOR SOAPTHRIVE BY HOPEone grant, 2023 · $50k
- AAADDICTION ALLIANCE OF GEORGIAone grant, 2023 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…
To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.
Hope atlanta seeks to help georgians avoid homelessness and hunger through a comprehensive approach that equips them with the tools for lifelong stability.our vision is to end hunger and homelessness for every georgian.
ACP is a group committed to identifying and providing leadership on selected issues important to driving the economic development of the city of Atlanta and for which the ACP's active involvement will make a major difference. The ACP has a…
To perpetuate a village community to provide progressive life assistance to adults with developmental disabilities so that they can maximize their abilities and maintain their independence in the least restrictive environment.
Our commitment is to provide the individual support, meaningful training and employment services to people to remove barriers and close skill gaps so that individuals build brighter futures.
Breakthrough atlanta pursues a dual mission: to increase academic opportunity for highly motivated, underserved students and get them into college ready to succeed; and inspire and develop the next generation of teachers and educational…
Georgia Center for Opportunity GCO is an independent, non-partisan think tank dedicated to increasing opportunity and improving the quality of life for all Georgians.
The school's mission is to provide challenging academics in a diverse environment, drawing on the quaker testimonies, or values, of simplicity, peace, integrity, community, equality and stewardship to empower students to go out into the…
Leading the creation and advancement of health equity we exist to improve the health and well-being of individuals and communities, increase the diversity of the health professional and scientific workforce, and address primary health care…
Girls on the Run Georgia empowers girls with vital social-emotional skills to help them succeed in school, at home, and within friendships. Our programs, Girls on the Run (3rd-5th grade) and Heart & Sole (6th-8th grade) are taught by…
To empower women and their children experiencing homelessness to achieve economic independence and long-term stability.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 111 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Cure Childhood Cancer Inc ↗
- Who funds MURPHY-HARPST CHILDREN'S CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds Collective Learning Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds GAINESVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL INC AKA LAKEVIEW ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SUNSHINE ON A RANNEY DAY INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds CITY OF REFUGE ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA MOUNTAIN FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HOPE THRU SOAP INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP TWIN LAKES INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE ATLANTA WOMENS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA CHILDREN'S SHELTER INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds REMERGE INC ↗
- Who funds Marquette University ↗
- Who funds THE ERIC R BEVERLY FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF HALL COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BOYCE L ANSLEY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds MOVING IN THE SPIRIT INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds LADY TS HOMELESS MINISTRY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Northeast Georgia · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · Bennett Thrasher Foundation Inc · Tw Marian W Ottley Atlanta Main · The Waterfall Foundation Inc · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Atlanta Community Food Bank Inc · The Richard C Munroe Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization St and Margaret D Harris Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.