Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Kc Action Fund

KC ACTION FUND's mission was to advocate for a world-class public education for all students through data, policy, and collaboration across kansas city.

$704k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$2.1MArts & Culture$113kCommunity Improvement$73k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $69k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $635k
$97,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHOOL SMART KC INC$200,000
BLAQUE PROMISE PROJECT$125,000
REVOLUCION EDUCATIVA INC$125,000
COMMUNITY CAPITAL FUND$97,500
PARENT POWER LAB INC$87,500
START AT ZERO$40,000
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$29,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $438k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%START AT ZERO: $85k → 15%START AT ZERO: $40k → 15%START AT ZERO: $25k → 15%PARENT POWER LAB: $120k → 15%PARENT POWER LAB INC: $88k → 15%PARENT POWER LAB INC: $80k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 41% of Kc Action Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in MO; read by stated purpose it is 59% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Kc Action Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 7 repeat orgs$200k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$2.1M
$200k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • B
    BLAQUE
    2× · 2020–2022 · $519k · revenue +507% · 32% of their budget
  • BP
    BLAQUE PROMISE PROJECT
    2× · 2023–2024 · $433k · revenue +108% · 48% of their budget
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CAPITAL FUND
    2× · 2023–2024 · $113k · revenue +307%

Funded once

  • SS
    SCHOOL SMART KC INC
    one grant, 2024 · $200k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Lean Lab Inc Lean Lab Education

We are a nonprofit organization that specializes in codesign research between education technology companies and schools. we match parents, learners and educators with edtech developers to inform, develop, and evaluate the next generation…

Education
2
Partnership for Regional Educational Preparation - Kansas City Inc

In a world where zip codes can predict outcomes, prep-kc ignites potential by bringing educators and industry professionals together to build paths to meaningful careers for students across the heart of bistate kansas city.

Education
3
The Civic Council of Greater Kansas City

To accelerate growth in the region's prosperity and quality of life for all by strategically deploying the personal and corporate resources, influence and expertise of the region's business and civic leaders.

4
Edhub Stl

The Education Equity Center of St. Louis advances a regional approach to achieving full racial equity in education by building anti-racist capacity towards systems level practices and policy changes.

Education
5
Kansas Parents As Teachers Association

Supporting early childhood education programs in kansas with a parent education component.

Education
6
Pta Kansas Congress of Parents and Teachers

To support and enhance the educational experience of students.

7
Kansas City Public Schools Education Foundation

To secure and provide funds and resources to enhance student learning in the kansas city public schools.

Education
8
Dc Bilingual Public Charter School

The mission of dc bilingual public charter school is to create a learning community that ensures high academic achievement for all students in both spanish and english, develops leadership, and values all cultures.

Education
9
Kansas City Kansas Community College Foundation

Kckcc foundation supports the overall mission of kckcc and its strategic goals and initiatives by managing and distributing student scholarships, building a broad network of engaged alumni, and securing philanthropic support of special…

Education
10
Kansas City Startup Foundation

To cultivate a thriving and inclusive entrepreneurial ecosystem in Kansas City.

Education
11
Kansas Council On Economic Education

The vision of the kcee is that every k-12 student in kansas will become economically and financially literate. in order to reach as many students as possible, the mission of the kcee is to equip teachers to teach economics and personal…

Social Science
12
Civic Council Foundation

To identify and cultivate future generations for civic engagement from the ranks of kansas city's up-and-coming business and community professionals and support the civic council of greater kansas city by focusing on the region's most…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is School Smart Kc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Start At Zero Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REVOLUCION EDUCATIVA — $531,080 · OtherREVOLUCION EDUCATIVABLAQUE — $519,210 · OtherBLAQUECHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $73,000 · OtherCHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF GREATER KANSAS CITYBLAQUE PROMISE PROJECT — $432,632 · EducationBLAQUE PROMISE PROJECTSCHOOL SMART KC INC — $200,000 · EducationSCHOOL SMART KC INCParent Power Lab Inc — $287,500 · Human ServicesParent Power Lab IncSTART AT ZERO INC — $150,000 · Human ServicesSTART AT ZERO INCCOMMUNITY CAPITAL FUND — $112,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,123,290Education$632,632Human Services$437,500Arts & Culture$112,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetREVOLUCION EDUCATIVA — $531,080 over 4y, 18% of budgetBLAQUE — $519,210 over 2y, 32% of budgetBLAQUE PROMISE PROJECT — $432,632 over 2y, 48% of budgetParent Power Lab Inc — $287,500 over 3y, 32% of budgetSCHOOL SMART KC INC — $200,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSTART AT ZERO INC — $150,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetCOMMUNITY CAPITAL FUND — $112,500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $73,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Health Forward FoundationMO15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Health Forward Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kc Action Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kc Action Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Kc Action Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph