Skip to content

· Private foundation

Spring Valley Kiwanis Club Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$49kYouth Development$10kHealth$4kArts & Culture$2kInternational$1kHuman Services$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kCrime & Legal$469Other$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$284k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Kiwanis Cal-Nev-Ha Foundation$3,300
Monte Vista High School$2,681
Grossmont College$2,250
Kiwanis International Foundation$1,300
University of Calif San Diego$1,250
Oregon State University$1,250
Boy Scout Troop 362$1,000
Rady Childrens Hospital$500
Spring Valley Community Alliance$300
Monte Vista High School$294
Rancho Elementary School$250
2025 Rose Float Project$250
San Diego Sheriffs Department$213
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 40% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Grand Canyon University: $1k → 11%Radys Childrens Hospital: $600 → 11%Univ Calif Santa Cruz: $1k → 13%Kiwanis Cal-Nev-Ha Foundation: $4k → 14%Cal State Univ Chico: $1k → 18%Kiwanis International Foundation: $1k → 16%Rady Childrens Hospital: $500 → 11%University of California Santa Cruz: $1k → 13%Kiwanis Cal-Nev-Ha Foundation: $3k → 14%Kiwanis International: $300 → 16%Rady Childrens Hospital: $300 → 11%Kiwanis Cal-Nev-Ha Foundation: $3k → 14%Kiwanis International: $300 → 16%Kiwanis Cal-Nev-Ha Foundation: $3k → 14%Kiwanis Cal-Nev-Ha Foundation: $2k → 14%American Cancer Society: $1k → 11%Kiwanis Cal-Nev-Ha Foundation: $1k → 14%Kiwanis Cal-Nev-Ha Foundation: $1k → 14%American Cancer Society: $1k → 11%Kiwanis Cal-Nev-Ha Foundation: $1k → 14%San Diego Mesa College: $2k → 11%Mesa College: $1k → 11%Laurels for Leaders: $1k → 11%UEI College: $1k → 11%Laurels for Leaders: $600 → 11%CA State Univ San Marcos: $500 → 11%Cuyamaca College: $1k → 11%Boy Scout Troop 362: $1k → 11%Monte Vista High School: $3k → 11%Monte Vista High School: $910 → 11%Monte Vista High School: $425 → 11%Spring Valley Community Alliance: $300 → 11%Monte Vista High School: $294 → 11%Casa de Oro Elementary: $290 → 11%San Diego State University: $3k → 11%Southwestern College: $1k → 11%Salvation Army: $400 → 11%Grossmont College: $4k → 11%Grossmont College: $2k → 11%Grossmont College: $1k → 11%Grossmont College: $500 → 11%Grossmont College: $500 → 11%UC San Diego: $2k → 11%University of Calif San Diego: $1k → 11%Young Actors Theater: $500 → 11%KYDS San Diego Foundation: $500 → 11%East County Transitional Living Ctr: $350 → 11%Point Loma Nazarene University: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$44k · 15 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
32

Total granted

$44k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+18%

Still filing today

27%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KIWANIS CAL-NEV-HA FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $18k · revenue +31%
  • KI
    KIWANIS INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2025 · $1k · revenue +35%
  • YA
    YOUNG ACTORS THEATER INC
    2× · 2018–2023 · $692 · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • SD
    San Diego State University
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • SD
    San Diego Mesa College
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • US
    UC San Diego
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
2
Building Industry Association of San Diego

The mission of the building industry association of san diego is to proactively promote a positive business environment for the land development, home building and commercial development industry throughout san diego county.

—
3
California Apartment Association

The organization's mission is to represent the ethical members of the rental housing industry in all aspects of government affairs within the state of california, and to provide information, products and services which contribute to the…

—
4
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
5
Young Men's Christian Association

The burbank community ymca (burbank y) is committed to strengthening the foundation of our community through youth development, healthy living, and social responsibility. we work within our community to ensure that everyone, regardless of…

Human Services
6
Credit Unions in the State of California Sierra Central Credit Union

As your financial institution, we pledge to serve you and our community faithfully. we will be friendly, helpful, and professional, and we will provide great products and competitive rates.

—
7
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
8
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education
9
San Diego County Credit Union

A not-for-profit credit union wholly owned by its members

—
10
Los Angeles Pacific University

Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.

Education
11
Keiller Leadership Academy

To create student leaders who value quality education and embrace their role as contributing members of our diverse community.

Education
12
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Spring Valley Community Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KIWANIS CAL-NEV-HA FOUNDATION: $18,391 · OtherKIWANIS CAL-NEV-HA FOUNDATIONGrossmont College: $8,250 · OtherGrossmont CollegeMonte Vista High School: $4,979 · OtherMonte Vista High SchoolSan Diego State University: $2,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,250 · Other+41 more: $29,415 · Other+41 moreGrand Canyon University: $1,250 · EducationPOINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $500 · EducationKIWANIS INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,490 · PhilanthropySPRING VALLEY COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $365 · Community ImprovementEAST COUNTY TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER: $350 · Housing & ShelterMARCH OF DIMES INC: $100 · Health
Other$66,035Education$1,750Philanthropy$1,490Community Improvement$365Housing & Shelter$350Health$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKIWANIS CAL-NEV-HA FOUNDATION: $18,391 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetKIWANIS INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,490 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG ACTORS THEATER INC: $692 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPOINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPRING VALLEY COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $365 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEAST COUNTY TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KIWANIS CAL-NEV-HA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KIWANIS INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Grand Canyon University ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG ACTORS THEATER INC ↗
  • Who funds POINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SPRING VALLEY COMMUNITY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds EAST COUNTY TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Spring Valley Kiwanis Club Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Spring Valley Kiwanis Club Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Spring Valley Kiwanis Club Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Spring Valley Kiwanis Club Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Spring Valley Kiwanis Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph