Skip to content

· Private foundation

Spirit in Action

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$141k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$227kCommunity Improvement$149kYouth Development$91kEmployment$73kInternational$68kHuman Services$56kEducation$47kHealth$44kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k33 grants · $106k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$3,500
Median grant
—
States reached
$923k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FLAMING CHALICE INTERNATIONAL$13,153
Individual grant recipient$11,790
APDEI$10,300
UBUNTU COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATION$7,060
EMPOWERING COMMUNITIES AS ACTORS FOR TRANSFORMING SOCIETIES (E-CATS)$7,000
Individual grant recipient$6,500
ADOLESCENT PSYCHOSOCIAL SUPPORT AND RESOURCE CENTRE (APSARC)$6,500
TERI FARM$4,300
KISEREM EPILEPSY FOUNDATION$4,300
MANYAMULA COMSIP COOPERATIVE$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,800
Individual grant recipient$3,800
UNIVERSAL LOVE ALLIANCE (ULA)$3,800
BURUNDI BRIDGES TO JUSTICE$3,800
COMMUNITY INITIATIVES FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT (CIFORD)$3,800
02The need
03

Where the grant dollars land

Across the US and around the world.

US giving: 0% of grant dollars ($3k). The 100% that went abroad ($963k) is mapped below.

Beyond the US: 100% of all-years giving ($963k)

8 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Kenya$457k · 157 grants
Uganda$182k · 55 grants
Malawi$157k · 46 grants
Canada$78k · 13 grants
Burundi$72k · 19 grants
Rwanda$12k · 4 grants
Congo (Kinshasa)$5k · 1 grant
Ghana$400 · 1 grant
How this is measured
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$775k · 46 repeat orgs$191k to everyone else

46 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
49

Total granted

$775k
$136k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    Manyamula COMSIP Cooperative
    8× · 2018–2025 · $88k
  • VW
    VISIONARY WOMEN'S CENTRE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2021–2025 · $41k

Funded once

  • CA
    CANADA AFRICA PARTNERSHIP (CAP) AIDS UGANDA
    one grant, 2024 · $11k
  • AA
    ASBL APDEI (ASSOCIATION POUR LA PROTECTION ET LA PROMOTION DES DROITS L'EDU
    one grant, 2024 · $11k
  • EC
    E-CAEMPOWERING COMMUNITIES AS ACTORS FOR TRANSFORMING SOCIETIES (E-CATS)
    one grant, 2024 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Manyamula COMSIP Cooperative: $88,018 · OtherManyamula COMSIP CooperativeVISIONARY WOMEN'S CENTRE: $49,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $41,395 · OtherFLAMING CHALICE INTERNATIONAL: $41,357 · OtherEMPOWERING COMMUNITIES AS ACTORS FOR TRANSFORMING SOCIETIES (E-CATS: $36,243 · OtherFLAMING CHALICE: $36,194 · Other+102 more: $672,737 · Other+102 more
Other$965,744

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Spirit in Action?

Find your warmest path to Spirit in Action through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 108 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Spirit in Action’s filings →

More from the funding graph