Skip to content

· Private foundation

Speller Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$22k
Granted FY2026still arriving
12
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$175kReligion$172kHuman Services$38kEducation$9kArts & Culture$3kRecreation & Sports$2kAnimals$2kHealth$1kOther$0
02FY2026 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$523k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,475
ABE'S GARDEN$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,600
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$3,500
JEWISH FEDERATION OF$1,650
BELMONT UNIVERSITY$1,000
GORDON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$750
NASHVILLE PUBLIC RADIO$500
WEST END SYNAGOGUE$500
Individual grant recipient$180
MAD MAVERICKS BASEBALL ACADEMY$100
GILDAS CLUB$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $50 → 14%RACH'S HOPE INC: $500 → 9%GORDON JEWISH COMMUNITY: $5k → 14%GORDON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $750 → 14%GORDON JEWISH COMMUNITY: $150 → 14%GORDON JEWISH COMMUNITY: $50 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CT
CA
MO
MD
TN
SC
LA
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$458k · 16 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
34

Total granted

$458k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+58%

Still filing today

38%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NASHVILLE
    4× · 2017–2026 · $6k · revenue +34%
  • Vanderbilt University
    2× · 2019–2020 · $3k · revenue +57%
  • US
    UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE
    4× · 2018–2024 · $2k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • UW
    US WOMENS AMATEUR CHAMPIONSHIP
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • NZ
    NASHVILLE ZOO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +42%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
8
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Brevard College Corporation

Brevard college is committed to an experiential liberal arts education that encourages personal growth and inspires artistic, intellectual, and social action.

Education
10
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
11
Jefferson Scholars Foundation

The jefferson scholars foundation (foundation) provides academic merit-based scholarship, fellowship and professorship support to students and faculty at the university of virginia (uva).

Philanthropy
12
The Branson School

To provide an academically exceptional education to students grade 9 through 12 in a warm, supportive, and nurturing environment.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University School of Nashville; the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
25/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF: $175,980 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OFWEST END SYNAGOGUE: $129,120 · OtherWEST END SYNAGOGUEIndividual grant recipient: $49,282 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION SHAARE EMETH: $37,428 · OtherCONGREGATION SHAARE EMETHRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $23,100 · Other+27 more: $33,926 · Other+27 moreVanderbilt University: $2,850 · EducationUNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE: $2,250 · EducationTHE HOLTON ARMS SCHOOL: $1,500 · EducationLANDON SCHOOL: $1,300 · EducationBelmont University: $1,000 · EducationTHE HARPETH HALL SCHOOL: $1,000 · EducationMary Institute and St Louis Country Day School: $500 · EducationNORWOOD SCHOOL INC: $500 · Education+2 more: $500 · EducationJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NASHVILLE: $5,950 · Human ServicesRACH'S HOPE INC: $500 · Human Services+2 more: $250 · Human ServicesABE'S GARDEN: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterNASHVILLE ZOO INC: $1,500 · AnimalsBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 · HealthMUSIC HEALTH ALLIANCE INC: $250 · HealthRENEWAL HOUSE INC: $250 · HealthNORTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $100 · HealthNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $50 · HealthFeeding America: $400 · Food & NutritionNASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC: $250 · Food & Nutrition
Other$448,836Education$11,400Human Services$6,700Housing & Shelter$5,000Animals$1,500Health$1,150Food & Nutrition$650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NASHVILLE: $5,950 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVanderbilt University: $2,850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE: $2,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOLTON ARMS SCHOOL: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE ZOO INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLANDON SCHOOL: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HARPETH HALL SCHOOL: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMary Institute and St Louis Country Day School: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRACH'S HOPE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNORWOOD SCHOOL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC HEALTH ALLIANCE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRASSLAND SCHOOL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST MISSOURI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRENEWAL HOUSE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN NASHVILLE SECTION: $110 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NASHVILLE ↗
  • Who funds ABE'S GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE ↗
  • Who funds THE HOLTON ARMS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE ZOO INC ↗
  • Who funds LANDON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Belmont University ↗
  • Who funds THE HARPETH HALL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Mary Institute and St Louis Country Day School ↗
  • Who funds RACH'S HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds NORWOOD SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC HEALTH ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds GRASSLAND SCHOOL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST MISSOURI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RENEWAL HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL14.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · The John and Heidi Hassenfeld Family Foundation · The Joel C & Bernice W Gordon Family Foundation · Memorial Foundation Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Shell USA Company Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Speller Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Speller Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Speller’s filings →

    More from the funding graph