Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Speller Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$175kReligion$172kHuman Services$38kEducation$9kArts & Culture$3kRecreation & Sports$2kAnimals$2kHealth$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$3,380
Median grant
4
States reached
$459k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF$25,000
WEST END SYNAGOGUE$9,500
Individual grant recipient$4,660
Individual grant recipient$3,380
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$500
Individual grant recipient$180
THE LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOC NE$100
HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY$50
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOSPICE BRAZOS VALLEY: $50 → 14%RACH'S HOPE INC: $500 → 9%GORDON JEWISH COMMUNITY: $5k → 14%GORDON JEWISH COMMUNITY: $150 → 14%GORDON JEWISH COMMUNITY: $50 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
CT
CA
MO
MD
TN
SC
LA
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$439k · 15 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
32

Total granted

$439k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+58%

Still filing today

40%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NASHVILLE
    3× · 2017–2022 · $5k · revenue +34%
  • Vanderbilt University
    2× · 2019–2020 · $3k · revenue +57%
  • US
    UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE
    4× · 2018–2024 · $2k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • UW
    US WOMENS AMATEUR CHAMPIONSHIP
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • NZ
    NASHVILLE ZOO INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -27%
  • NS
    NORWOOD SCHOOL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue +34%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
The Branson School

To provide an academically exceptional education to students grade 9 through 12 in a warm, supportive, and nurturing environment.

Education
7
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

8
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
9
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

11
Brevard College Corporation

Brevard college is committed to an experiential liberal arts education that encourages personal growth and inspires artistic, intellectual, and social action.

Education
12
Jefferson Scholars Foundation

The jefferson scholars foundation (foundation) provides academic merit-based scholarship, fellowship and professorship support to students and faculty at the university of virginia (uva).

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University School of Nashville and the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsFood Pantries & AssistancePublic University Foundatio…Urban Agriculture & Food Ac…Classical Music EnsemblesCommunity Health CentersHospice Care ServicesCommunity FoundationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsCancer Support OrganizationsSubstance Abuse TreatmentFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr17%9%10–20yr13%17%20–35yr11%35%35–55yr24%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr17%3%10–20yr13%6%20–35yr11%29%35–55yr24%60%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
13%
4,628/36,374

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
21/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF — $174,330 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OFWEST END SYNAGOGUE — $128,620 · OtherWEST END SYNAGOGUEIndividual grant recipient — $43,807 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION SHAARE EMETH — $37,428 · OtherCONGREGATION SHAARE EMETHRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES — $19,600 · Other+23 more — $29,336 · Other+23 moreVanderbilt University — $2,850 · EducationUNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE — $2,250 · EducationTHE HOLTON ARMS SCHOOL — $1,500 · EducationLANDON SCHOOL — $1,300 · EducationTHE HARPETH HALL SCHOOL — $1,000 · EducationNORWOOD SCHOOL INC — $500 · EducationMary Institute and St Louis Country Day School — $500 · Education+2 more — $500 · EducationJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NASHVILLE — $5,200 · Human ServicesRACH'S HOPE INC — $500 · Human ServicesTEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION — $200 · Human Services+1 more — $50 · Human ServicesNASHVILLE ZOO INC — $1,500 · AnimalsBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $500 · HealthRENEWAL HOUSE INC — $250 · HealthMUSIC HEALTH ALLIANCE INC — $250 · HealthNORTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $100 · HealthNational Kidney Foundation Inc — $50 · HealthFeeding America — $400 · Food & NutritionNASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC — $250 · Food & NutritionNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN NASHVILLE SECTION — $110 · Community Improvement
Other$433,121Education$10,400Human Services$5,950Animals$1,500Health$1,150Food & Nutrition$650Community Improvement$110

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NASHVILLE — $5,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVanderbilt University — $2,850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE — $2,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOLTON ARMS SCHOOL — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE ZOO INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLANDON SCHOOL — $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HARPETH HALL SCHOOL — $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORWOOD SCHOOL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRACH'S HOPE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMary Institute and St Louis Country Day School — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRENEWAL HOUSE INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRASSLAND SCHOOL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION — $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHEAST MISSOURI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC HEALTH ALLIANCE INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN NASHVILLE SECTION — $110 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NASHVILLE
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE
  • Who funds THE HOLTON ARMS SCHOOL
  • Who funds NASHVILLE ZOO INC
  • Who funds LANDON SCHOOL
  • Who funds THE HARPETH HALL SCHOOL
  • Who funds NORWOOD SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds RACH'S HOPE INC
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds Mary Institute and St Louis Country Day School
  • Who funds Feeding America
  • Who funds NASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC
  • Who funds RENEWAL HOUSE INC
  • Who funds GRASSLAND SCHOOL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST MISSOURI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MUSIC HEALTH ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds TEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN NASHVILLE SECTION
  • Who funds LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL14.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · The John and Heidi Hassenfeld Family Foundation · The Joel C & Bernice W Gordon Family Foundation · Memorial Foundation Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Shell USA Company Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Speller Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph