Skip to content

· Private foundation

Special Needs Advocacy

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$7kHealth$5kHuman Services$4kFood & Nutrition$3kPhilanthropy$3kHousing & Shelter$2kArts & Culture$1kCommunity Improvement$750Other$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$12k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,625
DTC Care$1,408
Individual grant recipient$1,370
St Judes Childrens Hospital$1,000
Individual grant recipient$775
Alliance for Empowerment$750
Broadway Community Food Bank$500
PACAN$500
AFI$500
Mural Arts Philadelphia$500
Life Center of Delaware County$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Mothers Home$500
WXPN$480
Individual grant recipient$445
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Operation Warm: $250 → 6%Alliance for Empowerment: $750 → 15%Mothers Home: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8k · 4 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$8k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
+74%

Still filing today

50%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    St Judes Childrens Hospital
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k
  • Philabundance
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2k · revenue -5%
  • SC
    Support Center for Child Advocates
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2k · revenue -5%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1k
  • AS
    AUTISM SPEAKS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue -38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women Against Abuse Inc

The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…

Human Services
2
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
3
Accessmatters

Accessmatters' mission is to protect, expand, and enhance access to sexual and reproductive health care and information for all people. accessmatters fulfills its mission by providing services and information directly to people, by…

Health
4
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
5
Parent Education and Advocacy Leadership Center

The mission of the peal center is to educate and empower families to ensure that children, youth and young adults with disabilities and special health care needs lead rich, active lives as full members of their schools and communities.

Education
6
The Children's Institute of Pittsburgh

To heal. to teach. to empower. to amaze.

Education
7
Vision for Equality Inc

Vision for equality works each day to serve, support and empower individuals with intellectual disabilities and their families bringing to them the information and tools they need to create the life of meaning they want and to successfully…

Health
8
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
9
Women's Center and Shelter of Greater Pittsburgh

The mission of women's center & shelter of greater pittsburgh is to strengthen our ability to meet the individual and evolving needs of those affected by domestic violence by investing in the growth of our people, deepening community…

Human Services
10
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
11
2020 Mom Policy Center for Maternal

The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…

Health
12
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Support Center for Child Advocates; the most unlike its peers is Schooner Youth Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
5/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Judes Childrens Hospital: $3,000 · OtherSt Judes Childrens HospitalIndividual grant recipient: $2,625 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $1,922 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDTC Care: $1,408 · OtherDTC CareIndividual grant recipient: $1,370 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $1,153 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $1,038 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $775 · Other+13 more: $5,045 · Other+13 morePhilabundance: $2,225 · Food & NutritionPhilabund…Support Center for Child Advocates: $1,500 · Crime & LegalEQUAL ACCESS LEGAL SERVICES INC: $250 · Crime & LegalALLIANCE FOR EMPOWERMENT INC: $750 · Human ServicesMOTHERS' HOME: $500 · Human ServicesOperation Warm Inc: $250 · Human ServicesAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $350 · HealthTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $480 · EducationSPOTLIGHT PA: $250 · EducationPHILADELPHIA MURAL ARTS ADVOCATES INC: $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$18,336Food & Nutrition$2,225Crime & Legal$1,750Human Services$1,500Health$850Education$730Arts & Culture$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPhilabundance: $2,225 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSupport Center for Child Advocates: $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR EMPOWERMENT INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MURAL ARTS ADVOCATES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOTHERS' HOME: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $480 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOONER YOUTH CENTER INC: $250 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetOperation Warm Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORPHANS OF THE STORM INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPOTLIGHT PA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL ACCESS LEGAL SERVICES INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds Support Center for Child Advocates ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR EMPOWERMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA MURAL ARTS ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds MOTHERS' HOME ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHOONER YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Operation Warm Inc ↗
  • Who funds ORPHANS OF THE STORM INC ↗
  • Who funds SPOTLIGHT PA ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL ACCESS LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Special Needs Advocacy funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Special Needs Advocacy. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Special Needs Advocacy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph