Skip to content

California · Public charity

Spay Neuter Imperative Project California

The organization provides communities of california a non-lethal solution to the homeless, abandoned and feral animal populations so that euthanasia is no longer an acceptable means of population control.

$63k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
5
Itemized grants FY2025
5
Organizations funded FY2024
60%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$48k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$6,660
Largest grant, FY2025
$15,000
Organizations funded a year
3 to 5
FY2023 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$1.1M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 60% of the organizations Spay Neuter Imperative Project California funded were first-time grantees, receiving 59% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving5$48k60%
FY20245$80k60%
FY20233$32kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Animals$111kCrime & Legal$25kHealth$15kPhilanthropy$10kYouth Development$10k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Spay Neuter Imperative Project California with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Spay Neuter Imperative Project California?

Find your warmest path to Spay Neuter Imperative Project California through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Spay Neuter Imperative Project California

How much does Spay Neuter Imperative Project California give?
Spay Neuter Imperative Project California reported 5 itemized grants totaling $48,114, out of $63,239 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 5 organizations a year over FY2023 to FY2024.
What does Spay Neuter Imperative Project California fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2025, its largest causes are Animals (65%), Crime & Legal (15%), Health (9%).
Who are Spay Neuter Imperative Project California's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2025: Monterey County Sheriff's Advisory Counc ($40k), Peace of Mind Dog Rescue ($34k), Pet Matchmaker Rescue CA Inc ($22k).
Does Spay Neuter Imperative Project California fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 60% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Spay Neuter Imperative Project California?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Spay Neuter Imperative Project California based?
Spay Neuter Imperative Project California is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Spay Neuter Imperative Project California’s filings →

More from the funding graph