Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Arizona · Public charity

Spay and Neuter Solutions

Promote animal welfare through financial assistance

$43k
Granted FY2023
4
Itemized grants FY2023
4
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2023
$40k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2023
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$15,000
States reached, FY2023
1

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
No Kill Pima County$15,000130%
Tuba City Humane Society Incorporated$10,00014%
Animal Rescue Connection$10,0001n/a
Oracle Animal Rescue & Rehabilitation Inc$5,00016%

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Spay and Neuter Solutions with peer funders

About Spay and Neuter Solutions

How much does Spay and Neuter Solutions give?
Spay and Neuter Solutions reported 4 itemized grants totaling $40,000, out of $43,250 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2023 IRS filing.
What does Spay and Neuter Solutions fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2023, its largest causes are Animals (100%).
Who are Spay and Neuter Solutions's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2023: No Kill Pima County ($15k), Tuba City Humane Society Incorporated ($10k), Animal Rescue Connection ($10k).
Which funders back the same organizations as Spay and Neuter Solutions?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Spay and Neuter Solutions based?
Spay and Neuter Solutions is based in AZ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $5k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home