Skip to content

Massachusetts · Public charity

Spam Benevolent Fund Inc

To assist members - state troopers, sergeants, and their families - in times of need and to provide scholarships.

$103k
Granted FY2023
5
Itemized grants FY2023
5
Organizations funded FY2023
80%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2023
$35k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2023
$6,605
Largest grant, FY2023
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 5
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
3
Total assets, FY2023
$729k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 80% of the organizations Spam Benevolent Fund Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 81% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23
PhilanthropyArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20235$35k80%
FY20223$17k100%
FY20211$6k100%
FY20191$6k100%
FY20182$37k50%
FY20174$28kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Human Services$34kEducation$22kHealth$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$18kPhilanthropy$15kArts & Culture$13kCrime & Legal$6k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 12 grantees

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($11k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Spam Benevolent Fund Inc supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 12 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGreg Hill Foundation Inc: $34,350 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetStephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation: $12,207 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTeam Impact Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBoston Bruins Charitable Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGuild of Saint Agnes of Worcester: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBoston Firefighters Local 718 Children's Fund Inc: $6,605 over 1y, 35% of budgetNtc Foundation: $6,605 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMassachusetts State Police Museum and Learning Center Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetMinnesota Chiefs of Police Foundation: $5,602 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetThe Boston Police Foundation Inc: $5,602 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetThe Giblin Family Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetTeamsters Local 25 Autism Fund Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Spam Benevolent Fund Inc with peer funders

About Spam Benevolent Fund Inc

How much does Spam Benevolent Fund Inc give?
Spam Benevolent Fund Inc reported 5 itemized grants totaling $34,879, out of $102,782 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 5 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Spam Benevolent Fund Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2023, its largest causes are Human Services (27%), Education (17%), Health (16%).
Who are Spam Benevolent Fund Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2023: Greg Hill Foundation Inc ($34k), Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation ($12k), Team Impact Inc ($10k).
Does Spam Benevolent Fund Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 80% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Spam Benevolent Fund Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Spam Benevolent Fund Inc based?
Spam Benevolent Fund Inc is based in MA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $100k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Spam Benevolent’s filings →

More from the funding graph