Skip to content

· Public charity

Southwest Michigan First Corp

Increase prosperity for all in Southwest Michigan.

$4.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Community Improvement$11MScience & Tech$396kArts & Culture$331kEmployment$72kSocial Science$25kHealth$20k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $3,982,488, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,115,604 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $133,116 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $117k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $554k
  • $250k+4 grants · $3.3M
$134,002
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
City of Kalamazoo$1,391,155
Village of Lawton$811,341
City of Sturgis$769,092
Kalamazoo Institute of Arts$331,171
Battle Creek Unlimited Inc$249,461
Village of Marcellus$170,501
Covert Township$134,002
Spencer Manufacturing Inc$25,000
One Well Brewing LLC$25,000
JCR Offroad Inc$25,000
Research Consultants International FDI Inc$20,000
Market One$11,000
Cornerstone Alliance$11,000
Hibshman Screw Machine Products Inc$8,765
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KALAMAZOO BASEBALL LLC: $15k → 9%PORTAGE ROBIN INC: $15k → 8%RCFC OF MICHIGAN INC: $15k → 11%LYONS INDUSTRIES: $25k → 12%DESIDERATA LLC: $15k → 12%BLISS ENTERPRISES INC: $15k → 13%CTW INC: $15k → 14%DECATUR TASTINGS LLC: $25k → 14%ALPHA RESOURCES LLC: $25k → 15%MARU KALAMAZOO LLC: $15k → 16%KAST ASSETS INC: $15k → 16%STURGIS WINGS LLC: $15k → 15%WHITTAKER WOODS GOLF CLUB LP: $15k → 14%KALAMAZOO CONCESSIONS LLC: $15k → 9%FRAME PRODUCTS: $25k → 14%Village of Lawton: $811k → 14%VILLAGE OF LAWTON: $39k → 14%ENVISION AUTOMATION LLC: $21k → 12%City of Kalamazoo: $1.4M → 12%Kalamazoo Institute of Arts: $331k → 12%CORNERSTONE ALLIANCE: $66k → 15%CITY OF KALAMAZOO: $27k → 12%GAISHIN MANUFACTURING LLC: $25k → 15%KOEHLER INDUSTRIES INC: $25k → 15%CORNERSTONE ALLIANCE: $22k → 15%JUNIPER RAYNE STUDIOS INC: $96k → 14%Village of Marcellus: $171k → 12%City of Sturgis: $769k → 13%VILLAGE OF MARCELLUS: $55k → 12%PARMA TUBE CORPORATION: $25k → 13%AFFINITY CUSTOM MOLDING INC: $25k → 13%CITY OF STURGIS: $22k → 13%Covert Township: $134k → 14%CITY OF MARSHALL: $327k → 14%PROGRESSIVE DYNAMICS INC: $25k → 14%Spencer Manufacturing Inc: $25k → 14%HANSON INTERNATIONAL INC: $25k → 15%BATTLE CREEK UNLIMITED: $2.4M → 14%Battle Creek Unlimited Inc: $249k → 14%LTW ERGONOMIC SOLUTIONS: $25k → 14%KNAPPEN MILLING COMPANY: $25k → 12%One Well Brewing LLC: $25k → 12%SHAWNEE SPECIALTIES INC: $25k → 15%266 MICHIGAN AVE KALAMAZOO LLC (CONEY ISLAND): $325k → 12%JCR Offroad Inc: $25k → 12%PRATT INTERMODAL CHASSIS LLC: $25k → 15%LAKESHORE DIE CAST: $25k → 15%VICKERS ENGINEERING INC: $25k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.0M · 40 repeat orgs$5.1M to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
237

Total granted

$7.0M
$4.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-17%
+160%

Still filing today

5%
1%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $421k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23’24’25
Community ImprovementArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BATTLE CREEK UNLIMITED INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $2.6M · revenue -74%
  • CO
    City of Kalamazoo
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1.4M
  • VO
    Village of Lawton
    2× · 2024–2025 · $850k

Funded once

  • 2E
    215 EM PARTNERS LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $550k
  • CO
    City of Marshall
    one grant, 2024 · $327k
  • 2M
    266 MICHIGAN AVE KALAMAZOO LLC (CONEY ISLAND)
    one grant, 2024 · $325k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—
2
Kinexus Youth Solutions

To equip young people with the skills to overcome barriers and success in education, employment, and in life.

Employment
3
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
4
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
5
Michigan Farm Bureau

Michigan farm bureau (mfb) is a member directed agricultural organization whose purpose is to represent, protect, and enhance the business, economic, social, and educational interests of our members located throughout the state of michigan.

—
6
Traverse City Center of Entrepreneurship

To cultivate a thriving and connected startup ecosystem in nw lower michigan.

—
7
Kalamazoo College

The mission of kalamazoo college is to prepare its graduates to better understand, live sucessfully within, and provide enlightened leadership to a richly diverse and increasingly complex world. as a highly selective, nationally renowened…

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
Harbor Country Chamber of Commerce

To promote business and economic development for eight towns in southwest michigan.

—
10
Small Business Association of Michigan

The small business association of michigan's mission is to help michigan small businesses succeed by promoting entrepreneurship, leveraging buying power and engaging in political advocacy.

—
11
Michigan Statewide Carpenters and Millwrights Joint Appr Train Fund

To provide education, training, and related benefits to eligible participants of the fund, through a taft hartley collectively barganined agreement.

Employment
12
Home Builders Association of Michigan

A voice of the building industry in Michigan. The primary purpose is to positively influence the legislative, regulatory and legal issues that affect the industry.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Market Vanburen; the most unlike its peers is Veterans of Foreign Wars Dept of Michigan Gus Karackson Post 2284. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 283 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

City of Kalamazoo: $1,418,292 · OtherCity of KalamazooVillage of Lawton: $849,997 · OtherVillage of LawtonCity of Sturgis: $791,292 · OtherCity of Sturgis215 EM PARTNERS LLC: $550,000 · Other215 EM PARTNERS LLCCity of Marshall: $327,200 · Other266 MICHIGAN AVE KALAMAZOO LLC (CONEY ISLAND): $325,000 · Other+191 more: $3,861,359 · Other+191 moreBATTLE CREEK UNLIMITED INC: $2,628,830 · Community ImprovementBATTLE CREEK UNLIMITED INCCORNERSTONE ALLIANCE: $98,500 · Community ImprovementKalamazoo Institute of Arts: $331,171 · Arts & Culture
Other$8,123,140Community Improvement$2,727,330Arts & Culture$331,171

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBATTLE CREEK UNLIMITED INC: $2,628,830 over 2y, 12% of budgetKalamazoo Institute of Arts: $331,171 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE ALLIANCE: $98,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS DEPT OF MICHIGAN GUS KARACKSON POST 2284: $15,000 over 1y, 12% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BATTLE CREEK UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Kalamazoo Institute of Arts ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE ALLIANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Small Business Association of MichiganMI14× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Small Business Association of Michigan · Battle Creek Community Foundation · Michigan College Access Network

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Southwest Michigan First Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Southwest Michigan First Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 283 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Southwest Michigan First’s filings →

    More from the funding graph