· Public charity
Southwest Human Development
SOUTHWEST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT strengthens the foundation arizona's children need for a great start in life.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ORGANIC GARDEN PRESCHOOL | $5,000 |
| SMALL PEOPLE PRESCHOOL | $5,000 |
| THE KIDS ACADEMY | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN CHILD CARE #48 | $5,000 |
| DISCOVERY TIME CHILDCARE | $5,000 |
| KID'S CORNER PRESCHOOL & CHILDCARE LLC | $5,000 |
| PREMIER CHILDREN'S CENTER | $5,000 |
| NANA'S PLACE PRESCHOOL ACADEMY | $5,000 |
| LEARNING WORKS PRESCHOOL | $5,000 |
| LITTLE EINSTEIN PRESCHOOL LLC | $5,000 |
| LITTLE KIDS N COMPANY | $5,000 |
| LINCOLN LEARNING CNETER | $5,000 |
| CHILDREN'S CAMPUS | $5,000 |
| TINY TOTS WEST | $5,000 |
| LEAR N PLAY INC | $5,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: Local Initiatives Support Corporation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Southwest Human Development funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Southwest Human Development. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Southwest Human Development’s filings →