Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Southwest Florida Regional Coalition to End Homelessness Inc

To support the planning, delivery and coordination of high quality services to the hungry, homeless and those at-risk of homelessness in collier county.

$551k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$122k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20182024.

Human Services$767kPhilanthropy$206kCivil Rights$38k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $334,334 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $551,449 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $217,115 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $38k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $297k
$106,255
Median grant
1
States reached
$826k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT BUILD$121,999
BEVERLY'S ANGELS$106,255
SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND CHILDR$68,304
NAPLES PRIDE$37,776
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $767k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BEVERLY'S ANGELS: $106k → 10%THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN (THE SHELTER): $95k → 10%THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $75k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND CHILDR: $68k → 10%THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $47k → 10%PROJECT BUILD: $122k → 10%The Shelter for Abused Women: $190k → 10%THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $63k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $538,303 · Human ServicesTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INCPROJECT BUILD SWFL — $121,999 · Human ServicesPROJECT BUILD SWFLBeverlys Angels Inc — $106,255 · Human ServicesBeverlys Angels IncUNITED WAY OF COLLIER AND THE KEYS INC — $206,291 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF COLLIER A…NAPLES PRIDE INC — $37,776 · Civil Rights
Human Services$766,557Philanthropy$206,291Civil Rights$37,776

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $538,303 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF COLLIER AND THE KEYS INC — $206,291 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetPROJECT BUILD SWFL — $121,999 over 1y, 20% of budgetBeverlys Angels Inc — $106,255 over 1y, 36% of budgetNAPLES PRIDE INC — $37,776 over 1y, 15% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Southwest Florida Regional Coalition to End Homelessness Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph