Skip to content
Southern California Doberman Pinscher Rescue Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Southern California Doberman Pinscher Rescue Inc

Rescued doberman pinsher dogs.

$150k
Granted FY2021
13
Grants FY2021
8
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0171% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2021.

Animals$182kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2021 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$191k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE HUMANE SOCIETY$20,000
PETA$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
IFAW FOUNDATION FOR ANIMALS$10,000
THE HUMANE FARMING ASSOCATION$10,000
ORPHAN ACRES$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
K9 Lifeline rescue$10,000
Second Chance for Blind Dogs$10,000
NOAHS LOST ARK$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ORPHAN ACRES: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
WI
NY
OH
CA
UT
VA
AZ
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
J-Lo's Animal Rescue & Sanctuary in

Animal care and rescue

Animals
3
Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

Animal Welfare

—
4
2nd Chance Ranch and Rescue

Sanctuary for abused or abandoned animals

Animals
5
Runaways Animal Rescue
Animals
6
Animal Angels
—
7
Platte Ranch Forever Home Sanctuary
Animals
8
Lexus Project Inc

Legal defense for animals

Animals
9
Paws Claws Exotics

A sanctuary for unfortunate animals

—
10
Asian Dogs Rescue Allies

To rescue at risk k-9s from asia.

Animals
11
Kiss for Homeless Animals
Animals
12
Forever Wild Wildlife Rescue
Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Best Friends Animal Society; the most unlike its peers is Keepers of the Wild. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $32,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETYPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $30,000 · AnimalsPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INCTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $10,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO …Keepers of the Wild: $10,000 · AnimalsKeepers of the WildANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $10,000 · AnimalsANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INCThe Brittany Foundation Animal Sanctuary: $10,000 · AnimalsThe Brittany Foundation Animal SanctuaryWOUNDED PAW PROJECT: $10,000 · AnimalsWOUNDED PAW PROJECTNOAH'S LOST ARK INC: $10,000 · AnimalsNOAH'S LOST ARK INCTHE HUMANE SOCIETY: $20,000 · OtherTHE HUMANE SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSecond Chance for Blind Dogs: $10,000 · OtherSecond Chance for Blind DogsIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE HUMANE FARMING ASSOCATION: $10,000 · OtherTHE HUMANE FARMING ASSOCATIONIFAW FOUNDATION FOR ANIMALS: $10,000 · OtherIFAW FOUNDATION FOR ANIMALSIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientK9 LIFELINE RESCUE INC: $10,000 · OtherK9 LIFELINE RESCUE INCORPHAN ACRES INC: $10,000 · Human Services
Animals$122,000Other$120,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $32,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKeepers of the Wild: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Brittany Foundation Animal Sanctuary: $10,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetWOUNDED PAW PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetORPHAN ACRES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNOAH'S LOST ARK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lee Merrick Foundatio…Surendra and Karen Gu…PC Fund for Animals C…Farrell Family Founda…Joyce a Ward Foundati…The Susan and Ford Sc…The Joe M & Doris R D…Bradford Family Found…Seckinger Foundation …Amg Charitable Gift F…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Lee Merrick Foundation IncTX15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lee Merrick Foundation Inc · Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation · PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · Farrell Family Foundation · Joyce a Ward Foundation · The Susan and Ford Schumann Foundation · The Joe M & Doris R Dealey Family Foundation · Bradford Family Foundation · Seckinger Foundation Corporation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Southern California Doberman Pinscher Rescue Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Southern California Doberman Pinscher Rescue Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Southern California Doberman Pinscher Rescue’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home