Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Southeast Kansas Coordinated Transit Council Inc

To coordinate transportation services for the public

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20242025.

Health$2.5MCommunity Improvement$1.0MHuman Services$182kEmployment$117kOther$391k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k5 grants · $672k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.6M
$181,599
Median grant
1
States reached
$153k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUR COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH$1,081,006
SEK-CAP INC$540,491
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF$225,029
ALLEN REGIONAL TRANSIT$181,599
CLASS LTD$132,163
TRI-VALLEY DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES$76,460
ELK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$56,637
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $182k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%ALLEN REGIONAL TRANSIT: $182k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.9M · 6 repeat orgs$332k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +5% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$3.9M
$151k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $182k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
HealthCommunity ImprovementEmploymentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FOUR COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +17%
  • SK
    SOUTHEAST KANSAS COMMUNITY ACTION P
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +20%
  • CL
    CLASS LTD
    2× · 2024–2025 · $273k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • TA
    THRIVE ALLEN COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $151k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jefferson County Service Organization Inc

Provide transportation, commodities, information and outreach to over 700 jefferson county, kansas residents.

2
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
3
Flint Hills Area Transportation Agency

The mission of Flint Hills Area Transportation Agency (the Organization) is to provide and promote the highest quality transit services to the Flint Hills communities.

4
Mental Health Center of East Central Kansas

To provide dynamic, culturally-sensitive, high quality behavioral healthcare to residents of chase, coffey, greenwood, lyon, morris, osage and wabaunsee counties in the most effective, caring and efficient manner.

Health
5
East Topeka Council on Aging Inc

The purpose of the East Topeka Council on Aging, Inc. is to assist older persons of Shawnee County in achieiving the optimum level of functioning.

Human Services
6
Clay County Task Force Inc

Providing low-cost public transportation for all in clay county and providing services to meet the needs of the seniors in our community.

Human Services
7
Stoddard County Transit Services Inc

Provide transportation to handicapped individuals and senior citizens.

8
River Bend Transit

The agency provides transportation services for the elderly, disabled, and general public.

Public Benefit
9
Tri-Valley Transit Inc

To enhance the economic, social and environmental health of the communities we serve by providing public transportation services for everyone that are safe, reliable, accessible and affordable.

Human Services
10
Konza Prairie Community Health Center Inc

Provide physician, dental and related healthcare services through clinics located in geary and riley county, kansas.

Health
11
Community Clinic of Southwest Missouri

The mission of the community clinic of southwest missouri is to improve the health of people in our community without access to medical, dental, or mental health care.

12
Scott County Transit System Inc

Public transportation

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Four County Mental Health Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Allen Regional Transit Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FOUR COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $2,012,127 · HealthFOUR COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INCCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF SE KANSAS INC — $376,149 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF SE KANSAS INCTHRIVE ALLEN COUNTY INC — $150,600 · HealthTHRIVE ALLEN COUNTY INCSOUTHEAST KANSAS COMMUNITY ACTION P — $1,025,448 · Community ImprovementSOUTHEAST KANSAS COMMUNITY …CLASS LTD — $273,061 · OtherCLASS LTDELK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $117,461 · OtherELK COUNTY…ALLEN REGIONAL TRANSIT INC — $181,599 · Human ServicesTRI-VALLEY DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC — $116,602 · Employment
Health$2,538,876Community Improvement$1,025,448Other$390,522Human Services$181,599Employment$116,602

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFOUR COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $2,012,127 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetSOUTHEAST KANSAS COMMUNITY ACTION P — $1,025,448 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF SE KANSAS INC — $376,149 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCLASS LTD — $273,061 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetALLEN REGIONAL TRANSIT INC — $181,599 over 1y, 21% of budgetTHRIVE ALLEN COUNTY INC — $150,600 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetELK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $117,461 over 2y, 41% of budgetTRI-VALLEY DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC — $116,602 over 2y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sunflower Foundation Health Care for KansansKS15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sunflower Foundation Health Care for Kansans · Community Foundation of Southeast Kansas · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Southeast Kansas Coordinated Transit Council Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph