· Public charity
Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium
Alaska native people working in partnership to provide the best healthcare for our communities.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 95% of SOUTHEAST ALASKA REGIONAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $83,522 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,325,415 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,241,893 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $35,000 |
| THUNDER MOUNTAIN HIGH SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| HEALTHY ALASKA NATIVES FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| JUNEAU DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| JUNEAU ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL | $10,000 |
| HEALING HANDS FOUNDATION | $8,522 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +226% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HHHEALING HAND FOUNDATION4× · 2019–2024 · $279k · revenue +67% · 37% of their budget
- OCOUTER COAST3× · 2019–2022 · $31k · revenue +226%
- JEJuneau Economic Development Council2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- TWThe Walker Foundationone grant, 2023 · $7.8M
- TSTHE SALVATION ARMYone grant, 2021 · $50k
- OVORGANIZAED VILLAGE OF KAKEone grant, 2020 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
SEACC's mission is to protect the special places of the world's largest temperate rainforest, promote conservation, and advocate for sustainability in human use of natural resources. Inspired by the land, wildlife, cultures, and…
Since 1971, the northern alaska environmental center has promoted environmental conservation and sustainable resource stewardship in interior and arctic alaska through education and advocacy.
The southeast alaska land trust (seal trust) collaborates with communities, individuals, and organizations throughout southeast alaska to help ensure that highly valued habitat, recreation, open space, and cultural and historic areas…
Alaska native people working in partnership to provide the best healthcare for our communities.
To encourage and assist in the continued development of existing business, education, and life in ketchikan.
The Alaska Hospital & Healthcare Association (AHHA) is a non-profit trade association representing more than 65 hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies, and other healthcare partners.Our members are distributed across…
The university of alaska fairbanks alumni association connects and supports uaf and its alumni. we encourage excellence in all aspects of the university and provide opportunities for alumni to engage in lifelong involvement with their…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthy Alaska Natives Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Sitkans Against Family Violence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Walker Foundation ↗
- Who funds HEALING HAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JUNEAU MOUNTAIN RESCUE ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OUTER COAST ↗
- Who funds SITKA COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds Juneau Economic Development Council ↗
- Who funds SITKANS AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY ALASKA NATIVES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SEALASKA HERITAGE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ALASKA NATIVE HEALTH BOARD ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST ALASKA ↗
- Who funds The Southeast Conference ↗
- Who funds GREATER SITKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds Breast Cancer Detection Center of Alaska and Charitable Corp ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rasmuson Foundation · The Alaska Community Foundation · Association of Alaska School Boards · First Nations Development Institute · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.