Skip to content
Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium

Alaska native people working in partnership to provide the best healthcare for our communities.

$3.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$9.6MCommunity Improvement$345kPhilanthropy$222kCivil Rights$150kPublic Benefit$115kPublic Safety & Disaster$85kFood & Nutrition$50kYouth Development$41kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $83,522, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,325,415 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,241,893 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN RED CROSS$35,000
JUNEAU ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL$10,000
THUNDER MOUNTAIN HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
HEALTHY ALASKA NATIVES FOUNDATION$10,000
JUNEAU DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
HEALING HANDS FOUNDATION$8,522
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SITKANS AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE: $20k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $35k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

24%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 23 repeat orgs$8.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +226% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
15

Total granted

$2.6M
$8.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+226%
0%

Still filing today

26%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HEALING HAND FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2024 · $279k · revenue +36% · 37% of their budget
  • OC
    OUTER COAST
    3× · 2019–2022 · $31k · revenue +226%
  • JE
    Juneau Economic Development Council
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • TW
    The Walker Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $7.8M
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • JM
    JUNEAU MOUNTAIN RESCUE
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -39% · 41% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alaska Historical Publication Association
Education
2
Alaska Rural Electric Cooperative Association Educational Foundation Inc
Environment
3
The Aleut Foundation
Education
4
Arctic Encounter

The mission of the Arctic Encounter Symposium is to convene leaders and experts from every arena to tackle the shared interests and concerns of the United States and the global community as we look north to the last emerging frontierthe…

Environment
5
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council Inc-Seacc

SEACC's mission is to protect the special places of the world's largest temperate rainforest, promote conservation, and advocate for sustainability in human use of natural resources. Inspired by the land, wildlife, cultures, and…

Environment
6
Alaskans for Better Elections Foundation
Civil Rights
7
Northern Alaska Environmental Center

Since 1971, the northern alaska environmental center has promoted environmental conservation and sustainable resource stewardship in interior and arctic alaska through education and advocacy.

Environment
8
Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium

Alaska native people working in partnership to provide the best healthcare for our communities.

Health
9
Greater Ketchikan Chamber Commerce

To encourage and assist in the continued development of existing business, education, and life in ketchikan.

—
10
University of Alaska Fairbanks Alumni Association

The university of alaska fairbanks alumni association connects and supports uaf and its alumni. we encourage excellence in all aspects of the university and provide opportunities for alumni to engage in lifelong involvement with their…

Education
11
Southeast Alaska Land Trust

The southeast alaska land trust (seal trust) collaborates with communities, individuals, and organizations throughout southeast alaska to help ensure that highly valued habitat, recreation, open space, and cultural and historic areas…

Environment
12
Alaska Hospital & Healthcare Association

The Alaska Hospital & Healthcare Association (AHHA) is a non-profit trade association representing more than 65 hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies, and other healthcare partners.Our members are distributed across…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthy Alaska Natives Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Sitkans Against Family Violence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Walker Foundation: $7,781,511 · OtherThe Walker Foundation+30 more: $2,477,562 · Other+30 moreHEALING HAND FOUNDATION: $278,622 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST ALASKA: $15,000 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION: $31,691 · EducationOUTER COAST: $30,500 · EducationAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $35,000 · Human ServicesSITKANS AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE: $20,000 · Human ServicesJUNEAU MOUNTAIN RESCUE: $50,000 · Public Safety & DisasterSITKA COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterHEALTHY ALASKA NATIVES FOUNDATION: $16,000 · HealthSEALASKA HERITAGE INSTITUTE: $15,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$10,259,073Philanthropy$293,622Education$62,191Human Services$55,000Public Safety & Disaster$50,000Housing & Shelter$25,000Health$16,000Arts & Culture$15,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEALING HAND FOUNDATION: $278,622 over 4y, 37% of budgetJUNEAU MOUNTAIN RESCUE: $50,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION: $31,691 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUTER COAST: $30,500 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetSITKA COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $25,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetJuneau Economic Development Council: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSITKANS AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE: $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHEALTHY ALASKA NATIVES FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSEALASKA HERITAGE INSTITUTE: $15,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALASKA NATIVE HEALTH BOARD: $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST ALASKA: $15,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetThe Southeast Conference: $15,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetGREATER SITKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBreast Cancer Detection Center of Alaska and Charitable Corp: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Walker Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HEALING HAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JUNEAU MOUNTAIN RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OUTER COAST ↗
  • Who funds SITKA COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Juneau Economic Development Council ↗
  • Who funds SITKANS AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY ALASKA NATIVES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEALASKA HERITAGE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ALASKA NATIVE HEALTH BOARD ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST ALASKA ↗
  • Who funds The Southeast Conference ↗
  • Who funds GREATER SITKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds Breast Cancer Detection Center of Alaska and Charitable Corp ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rasmuson FoundationThe Alaska Community …Association of Alaska…First Nations Develop…Amazonsmile Foundation
Rasmuson FoundationAK23.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rasmuson Foundation · The Alaska Community Foundation · Association of Alaska School Boards · First Nations Development Institute · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home