Skip to content
Society for Information Management Dfw Chapter at a glance

· Public charity

Society for Information Management Dfw Chapter

Provide further education & business interaction within information management profession.

$60k
Granted FY2026still arriving
7
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Science & Tech$46kEmployment$29kEducation$18kHealth$10kYouth Development$7kHuman Services$7k
02FY2026 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $55,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $60,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k5 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$7,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$542k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION INC$10,000
DALLAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC$10,000
BOLD IDEA INC$7,000
NONPAREIL INSTITUTE$7,000
FIRST IN TEXAS$7,000
NPOWER INC$7,000
DALLAS COMMUNITY LIGHTHOUSE$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–26, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FIRST IN TEXAS: $10k → 16%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $10k → 5%FIRST IN TEXAS: $7k → 16%NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $7k → 5%BOLD IDEA INC: $7k → 14%BOLD IDEA INC: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$114k · 5 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -16% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2026, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$114k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-16%

Still filing today

80%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NI
    NPOWER INC
    4× · 2023–2026 · $36k · revenue +43%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $30k
  • FF
    Foundation for Inspiration & Recognition of Scienc
    2× · 2025–2026 · $17k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR THE YOUNG WOMENS LEADERSHIP ACADEMY
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue -16%
  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO YOUNG WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP ACADEMY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2025 · $7k · revenue 0%
  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS
    one grant, 2024 · $7k · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas Alliance of Technology & Women

Dfw*atw is a vital non-profit organization committed to supporting the holistic eduction and professional journey for girls and women in technology while increasing the number of women in leadership.

Science & Tech
2
Tech Titans Foundation

To build a robust STEM workforce pipeline

Education
3
Girls in Stem
Human Services
4
Girls Service League Inc
Philanthropy
5
Tex-E Inc
Education
6
British American Foundation of Texas

See Schedule O.The British American Foundation of Texas (BAFTX) enables financially challenged, Texas-based students who excel academically to fulfill their exceptional potential by supporting their US college education. We also provide a…

Philanthropy
7
North Texas Lead

North texas lead creates a bridge between company partners and qualified job-seekers. we build a growing community of leaders by connecting top talent with top employers. north texas lead works with employers and community leaders…

Civil Rights
8
Forty First Foundation

The forty first foundation supports and advances the university of texas at austin in its pursuit of excellence. we work closely with the office of the president to identify, fund, and implement strategic initiatives that enhance the…

Education
9
The Gems Camp

Our aim is to increase the percentage of Black and Latina women earning bachelors degrees in STEM to improve gender, racial, and socioeconomic diversity, equity, and inclusion in the U.S. STEM workforce.

Youth Development
10
Girls Incorporated of Greater Houston

The mission of Girls Incorporated of Greater Houston is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart and bold.

Youth Development
11
The School for Global Thinkers

Our mission is to challenge and nurture young women to thrive in future global markets through personalized STEM advanced academics. Through a supportive small school and single-gender environment, project-based learning, and STEM advanced…

Education
12
Stem Advantage

Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girl Scouts of Northeast Texas; the most unlike its peers is Npower Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
3/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Foundation for Inspiration & Recognition of Scienc: $17,000 · Human ServicesFoundation for Inspiration & Recogn…NONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $16,500 · Human ServicesNONPAREIL INSTITUTEBOLD IDEA INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesBOLD IDEA INCDALLAS COMMUNITY LIGHTHOUSE: $7,000 · Human ServicesDALLAS COMMUNITY LIGHTHOUSETHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS: $30,250 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS…UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS: $6,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEX…NPOWER INC: $36,000 · Community ImprovementNPOWER INCFOUNDATION FOR THE YOUNG WOMENS LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $11,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR THE…DALLAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationDALLAS COLLEGE FOU…SAN ANTONIO YOUNG WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $7,000 · EducationSAN ANTONIO YOUNG …UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS: $7,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$54,500Other$36,250Community Improvement$36,000Education$28,000Philanthropy$10,000Youth Development$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNPOWER INC: $36,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFoundation for Inspiration & Recognition of Scienc: $17,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNONPAREIL INSTITUTE: $16,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBOLD IDEA INC: $14,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE YOUNG WOMENS LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $11,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSAN ANTONIO YOUNG WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Society for Information Management Dfw Chapter funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Society for Information Management Dfw Chapter. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Society for Information Management Dfw Chapter?

    Find your warmest path to Society for Information Management Dfw Chapter through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Society for Information Management Dfw Chapter’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home