Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Snow Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2021
24
Grants FY2021
8
States reached
$1k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

97% of Snow Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Snow Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $8k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
21
3
22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212022.

Philanthropy$58kFood & Nutrition$2kHuman Services$2kHousing & Shelter$1kAnimals$500Employment$500Public Safety & Disaster$500Recreation & Sports$500Other$0
02FY2021 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$300
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Lawrence Foundation$1,000
Celebration Child Care$1,000
Lambs Farm Foundation$500
Our House of Hope$500
St Lawrence Church$500
Hope Food Pantry$500
American Red Cross$500
Glenkirk Foundation$500
Ill Restaurant Asso Ed Foudation$500
PADS Lake County$500
Individual grant recipient$300
Individual grant recipient$300
Salvation Army$300
Wounded Warrior Project$300
Smile Train$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 14% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Warriors and Quiet Waters Foundatio: $100 → 10%SPCAI Global Rescue: $100 → 17%Fidelity Charitable: $57k → 8%VFW: $12 → 15%Habitat for Humanity: $50 → 22%Celebration Child Care: $1k → 8%Special Olympics Illinois: $300 → 11%Steppenwolf Theatre Foundation: $100 → 14%Salvation Army: $300 → 9%Smile Train: $200 → 17%St Lawrence Foundation: $1k → 8%Special Olympics Illinois: $200 → 11%Ill Restaurant Asso Ed Foudation: $500 → 14%Coalition for Rainforest Nations: $100 → 17%Lambs Farm: $750 → 8%WTTW Channel 11: $100 → 14%Our House of Hope: $500 → 8%Little Brothers: $300 → 14%Glenkirk Foundation: $500 → 8%Lambs Farm Foundation: $500 → 8%St Lawrence Church: $500 → 8%Hope Food Pantry: $500 → 8%Lake Cty Haven: $300 → 8%Mainstreet LIbertyville: $200 → 8%PADS Lake County: $500 → 8%PADS Lake County: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
IL
NY
IA
MO
VA
KS
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3k · 3 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +73% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
21

Total granted

$3k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+13%

Still filing today

100%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22
HealthHuman ServicesEmploymentAnimalsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LAMBS FARM INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1k · revenue +73%
  • PL
    PADS Lake County Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1k · revenue +94%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $500 · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • SL
    St Lawrence Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • CC
    Celebration Child Care
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • OH
    OUR HOUSE OF HOPE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
3
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
4
Lakeshore Foundation

To provide opportunity for individuals with disability to live a healthy lifestyle through physical activity, research, advocacy and health promotion.

Health
5
Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Wisconsin Inc

The mission of goodwill industries of southeastern wisconsin, inc. ("goodwill") is: connecting people to work. preparing people for life. goodwill is dedicated to creating collective community impact through (continued on schedule o)

Employment
6
Land of Lincoln Goodwill Industries Inc

To empower people with special needs to become self-sufficient through the power of work.

Employment
7
Leashes of Valor

Our organization's mission is to raise awareness for and provide physical aid and support to disabled us military veterans. our program covers a crucial gap in the industry-a veteran operated organization, that can assist veterans with…

Public Benefit
8
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
9
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
10
Living Well Disability Services

Living Well Disability Services transforms the lives of people impacted by disabilities through the delivery of exceptional services.

11
Comagine Health

With our partners, we work to improve health and create a better health care system so that people and communities will flourish.

12
Lake County Partnership for Economic Dev

To maintain economic vitality and quality of life in lake county, illinois by creating and retaining quality jobs, stimulating capital investment, pursuing economic diversity and improving the county's business climate.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pads Lake County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $56,725 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDSt Lawrence Foundation — $1,000 · OtherSt Lawrenc…Celebration Child Care — $1,000 · OtherCelebratio…Hope Food Pantry — $500 · OtherHope Food …ST LAWRENCE CHURCH — $500 · OtherST LAWRENC…Ill Restaurant Asso Ed Foudation — $500 · OtherIll Restau…SPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS — $500 · OtherSPECIAL OL…Glenkirk Foundation — $500 · OtherGlenkirk F…Individual grant recipient — $300 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $300 · OtherSalvation Army — $300 · Other+7 more — $762 · Other+7 moreTHE LAMBS FARM INC — $1,250 · EmploymentPADS Lake County Inc — $1,000 · HealthWARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC — $100 · HealthAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $300 · Human ServicesOUR HOUSE OF HOPE INC — $500 · AnimalsCOALITION FOR RAINFOREST NATIONS SECRETARIAT — $100 · Environment
Community Improvement$56,725Other$6,162Employment$1,250Health$1,100Human Services$800Animals$500Environment$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $56,725 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAMBS FARM INC — $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPADS Lake County Inc — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUR HOUSE OF HOPE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMainStreet Libertyville Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR RAINFOREST NATIONS SECRETARIAT — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

AbbVie FoundationIL12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Snow Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph