Skip to content

· Private foundation

Snoeyenbos Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Youth Development$115kEducation$57kReligion$48kHealth$47kHuman Services$28kArts & Culture$26kAnimals$20kInternational$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$609k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION$25,000
ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH$6,000
CAMP LUTHER$5,000
TARPON SPRINGS SHEPHERD CENTER$5,000
ST MARKS LUTHERAN CHURCH$2,000
ACTS 18 MINISTRY$2,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
EDGAR SCHOOL DISTRICT$1,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT$1,000
WAUSAU SCHOOL FOUNDATION$1,000
GOODNEWS PROJECT$500
NORTH CENTRAL WI FELLOWSHIP$500
STEPPING STONES OF DUNN COUNTY$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TARPON SPRINGS SHEPHERD CENTER: $5k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $1k → 12%TARPON SPRINGS SHEPHERD CENTER: $5k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $500 → 12%TARPON SPRINGS SHEPHERD CENTER: $5k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $500 → 12%TARPON SPRINGS SHEPHERD CENTER: $5k → 12%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$320k · 18 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
9

Total granted

$320k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+11%

Still filing today

61%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthInternationalEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $15k · revenue +32%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $14k · revenue +89%
  • SS
    STEPPING STONES OF DUNN COUNTY INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $7k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • SP
    Suncoast Primate Sanctuary Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +64%
  • FF
    FETCH FOSTER AND RESCUE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -34%
  • SA
    SUNCOAST ANIMAL LEAGUE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Wake County Inc

Located in raleigh, nc, the spca of wake county works in over half the state of north carolina through collaborative partnerships that save pets and help people. significant activities include: decreasing the number of animals entering…

Animals
2
Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals
3
Wisconsin Humane Society

The mission of the Wisconsin Humane Society is to make a difference for animals and the people who love them.

Animals
4
Sweet Dreams Senior Pet Sanctuary

The mission of sweet dreams senior pet sanctuary is to support elderly individuals who can no longer care for their senior pets by providing a safe and loving home for their cherished companions. the sanctuary offers two primary programs…

Animals
5
St Vincent De Paul Society of Milwaukee

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of milwaukee is to eliminate poverty and hunger.

Human Services
6
St Andrews Charitable Foundation

To improve the quality of life for seniors in need through reliable and compassionate care.

Philanthropy
7
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
8
Gathering of Southeast Wi Inc

To provide meals and associated services or programs to those who would otherwise go hungry or without.

Human Services
9
Society of St Vincent de Paul of Waukesha County

We provide financial and spiritual aid to the underprivileged, including rent and utility assistance, food, clothing, household items so they can meet their financial obligations caused by unexpected circumstances. We served over 46 people…

—
10
Habitat for Humanity of Waukesha County Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action. habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
11
Sunshine Place Inc

To provide comprehensive services that support essential needs through community engagement and partnerships.

Human Services
12
Humane Fort Wayne Inc

Humane fort wayne is a trusted partner providing comprehensive, lifesaving resources to pets and their people.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighbors Place Inc the; the most unlike its peers is Acts 18 Ministry Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAMP LUTHER INC: $100,000 · OtherCAMP LUTHER INCST MARKS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $28,300 · OtherST MARKS LUTHERAN CHURCHALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · OtherALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATIONJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT: $15,300 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENTNEIGHBORS PLACE INC THE: $8,500 · Other+16 more: $52,200 · Other+16 moreWAUSAU SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $51,000 · EducationWAUSAU SCHOOL F…PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureTarpon Springs Shepherd Center Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $4,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $1,000 · Human ServicesActs 18 Ministry Incorporated: $18,000 · ReligionMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $14,000 · InternationalGOOD NEWS PROJECT INC: $2,800 · InternationalALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 · HealthRISE UP INC: $1,000 · Health
Other$229,300Education$51,000Arts & Culture$25,000Human Services$25,000Religion$18,000International$16,800Health$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWAUSAU SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $51,000 over 8y, 6.0% of budgetPERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTarpon Springs Shepherd Center Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetActs 18 Ministry Incorporated: $18,000 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $14,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORS PLACE INC THE: $8,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSTEPPING STONES OF DUNN COUNTY INC: $6,750 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSuncoast Primate Sanctuary Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetFETCH FOSTER AND RESCUE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSUNCOAST ANIMAL LEAGUE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD NEWS PROJECT INC: $2,800 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUSTA MIDWEST TENNIS & EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRISE UP INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WAUSAU SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Tarpon Springs Shepherd Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Acts 18 Ministry Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORS PLACE INC THE ↗
  • Who funds STEPPING STONES OF DUNN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Suncoast Primate Sanctuary Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FETCH FOSTER AND RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNCOAST ANIMAL LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON ↗
  • Who funds GOOD NEWS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds USTA MIDWEST TENNIS & EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds RISE UP INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bell Family Charitable Foundation IWI17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bell Family Charitable Foundation I · Community Foundation of North Central Wisconsin Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Ba & Esther Greenheck Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Lewitzke Foundation Inc · Dudley Foundation Inc · Judd S Alexander Foundation · Abbybank Foundation Inc · Incrediblebank Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Snoeyenbos Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Snoeyenbos Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Snoeyenbos Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Snoeyenbos Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Snoeyenbos Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph