Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Smith Family Benevolent Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$134k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Civil Rights$182kInternational$117kEnvironment$89kHuman Services$79kHousing & Shelter$70kHealth$51kYouth Development$32kCrime & Legal$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $98k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$905k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$13,535
FOS FEMINISTA$13,534
STRIVE$10,134
STAND UP FOR KIDS INC$10,134
HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST$10,111
CHARITYWATER$10,049
EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS$10,048
FIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT CENTER$10,017
AIU FOUNDATION$10,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION$7,628
OXFAM AMERICA$6,068
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$6,068
WILD EARTH ALLIES$5,138
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$4,500
SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHARITYWATER: $11k → 17%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $11k → 7%CHARITYWATER: $11k → 17%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $260 → 7%CHARITYWATER: $11k → 17%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $200 → 7%CHARITYWATER: $10k → 17%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $200 → 7%CHARITYWATER: $10k → 17%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%CHARITYWATER: $6k → 17%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $2k → 14%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $750 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MD
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$732k · 22 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
4

Total granted

$732k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+221%

Still filing today

73%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CHARITY GLOBAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $79k · revenue +36%
  • WE
    Wild Earth Allies Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $74k · revenue +102%
  • AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID
    5× · 2017–2021 · $53k · revenue +161%

Funded once

  • AI
    ADRENAL INSUFFICIENCY FUND UNITED
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
  • EJ
    EARTH JUSTICE WORKS
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
  • SF
    STRIVE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue +221%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

3
Rights and Resources Institute Inc

Rri's mission is to support local communities and indigenous peoples' struggles against poverty and marginalization by promoting greater global commitment and action towards policy, market, and legal reforms that secure their rights to…

Environment
4
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
5
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
8
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
9
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
10
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
11
Rainforest Alliance Holding Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

Environment
12
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Human Rights First and the most unlike its peers is The National Adrenal Diseases Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
9/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

StandUp for Kids — $63,114 · OtherStandUp for KidsAIU FOUNDATION — $53,000 · OtherAIU FOUNDATIONAMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE — $52,750 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEEFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $41,924 · OtherFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT CENTERYOUTH BUILD — $31,750 · OtherYOUTH BUILDTHE NATIONAL ADRENAL DISEASES FOUNDATION — $19,750 · OtherTHE NATIONAL ADRENAL DISEASES FOUNDATIONRSDSA — $15,350 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $11,378 · Other+5 more — $43,058 · Other+5 moreHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST — $94,702 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS FIRSTAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID — $52,750 · InternationalAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE …INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION — $20,451 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PAREN…International Rescue Committee INC — $9,068 · International+2 more — $9,818 · InternationalCHARITY GLOBAL INC — $78,833 · Human ServicesCHARITY GLOBA…Charity Navigator — $12,160 · Human ServicesCharity Navig…+1 more — $2,250 · Human ServicesWild Earth Allies Inc — $73,944 · EnvironmentWild Earth …SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $4,500 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB…EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS — $31,265 · Crime & LegalSTRIVE INTERNATIONAL INC — $31,244 · EmploymentPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $20,418 · Health
Other$332,074International$186,789Human Services$93,243Environment$78,444Crime & Legal$31,265Employment$31,244Health$20,418

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST — $94,702 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC — $78,833 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWild Earth Allies Inc — $73,944 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetStandUp for Kids — $63,114 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID — $52,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE WORKS — $31,265 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTRIVE INTERNATIONAL INC — $31,244 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION — $20,451 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $20,418 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL ADRENAL DISEASES FOUNDATION — $19,750 over 2y, 13% of budgetCharity Navigator — $12,160 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $11,378 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTRIVE FOUNDATION — $10,908 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $9,068 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC — $6,068 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC — $3,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL — $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST
  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC
  • Who funds Wild Earth Allies Inc
  • Who funds StandUp for Kids
  • Who funds AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS
  • Who funds STRIVE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL ADRENAL DISEASES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Charity Navigator
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds STRIVE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Smith Family Benevolent Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Oxfam-America Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Smith Family Benevolent Fund?

Find your warmest path to Smith Family Benevolent Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph