Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Slotnick Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$71k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$450kHealth$129kReligion$110kFood & Nutrition$13kPhilanthropy$9kRecreation & Sports$7kHuman Services$3kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY$35,000
BALTIMORE HEBREW CONGREGATION$6,800
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$6,000
AMERICAN UNIVERSITY$5,000
MT WASH PEDIATRIC HOSP$4,000
TEMPLE ADATH YESHURUN$4,000
CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION$3,000
BRONX HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$2,125
GARRISON FOREST SCHOOL$2,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLAND$1,000
BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$1,000
MERCY WORKS INC$500
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC$500
ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MERCY WORKS INC: $4k → 14%CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION: $17k → 17%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%BALTIMORE HEBREW CONGREGATION: $9k → 11%CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION: $11k → 17%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%BALTIMORE HEBREW CONGREGATION: $8k → 11%CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%BALTIMORE HEBREW CONGREGATION: $8k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $7k → 19%CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION: $8k → 17%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%BALTIMORE HEBREW CONGREGATION: $8k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $7k → 19%CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION: $7k → 17%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%BALTIMORE HEBREW CONGREGATION: $8k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $6k → 19%CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION: $4k → 17%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%BALTIMORE HEBREW CONGREGATION: $7k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $6k → 19%CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION: $4k → 17%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%BALTIMORE HEBREW CONGREGATION: $7k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%BALTIMORE HEBREW CONGREGATION: $7k → 11%BALTIMORE HEBREW CONGREGATION: $6k → 11%TEMPLE ADATH YESHURUN: $6k → 14%MT WASH PEDIATRIC HOSP: $5k → 11%TEMPLE ADATH YESHURUN: $6k → 14%MT WASH PEDIATRIC HOSP: $5k → 11%TEMPLE ADATH YESHURUN: $5k → 14%MT WASH PEDIATRIC HOSP: $4k → 11%TEMPLE ADATH YESHURUN: $5k → 14%TEMPLE ADATH YESHURUN: $5k → 14%FUND FOR BLOOD AND CANCER RESEARCH: $5k → 17%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $35k → 14%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $35k → 14%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $35k → 14%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $35k → 14%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $35k → 14%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $35k → 14%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $35k → 14%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $35k → 14%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$716k · 17 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
3

Total granted

$716k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+238%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $310k · revenue +45%
  • CC
    CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $66k · revenue +12%
  • AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF CNY
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • NP
    NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +238%
  • CA
    CREDIT ABUSE RESISTANCE EDUCATION
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue -44%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Harvard Club of Washington Dc

To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

Education
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
8
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
11
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc and the most unlike its peers is A New Chance Animal Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $310,000 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITYAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $37,500 · EducationAMERICAN UNIVERSITYJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $34,515 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYGARRISON FOREST SCHOOL INC — $18,000 · EducationFOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC — $15,500 · EducationMERCYWORKSINCORPORATED — $15,000 · EducationBALTIMORE HEBREW CONGREGATION — $66,700 · OtherBALTIMORE HEBREW CONGREGATIONTEMPLE ADATH YESHURAN — $43,000 · OtherTEMPLE ADATH YESHURANMT WASH PEDIATRIC HOSP — $37,000 · OtherMT WASH PEDIATRIC HOSPTHE FUND FOR BLOOD AND CANCER RESEARCHINC — $25,452 · OtherTHE FUND FOR BLOOD AND CANCER R…BRONX HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $19,375 · OtherBRONX HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCI…+4 more — $8,085 · OtherCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $66,300 · HealthCROHN'S & …MEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLANDINC — $12,500 · Food & NutritionCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $7,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INC — $4,500 · PhilanthropyA NEW CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $1,000 · AnimalsCREDIT ABUSE RESISTANCE EDUCATION — $500 · Community Improvement
Education$430,515Other$199,612Health$66,300Food & Nutrition$12,500Recreation & Sports$7,000Philanthropy$4,500Animals$1,000Community Improvement$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $310,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $66,300 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $37,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $34,515 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FUND FOR BLOOD AND CANCER RESEARCHINC — $25,452 over 8y, 6.7% of budgetGARRISON FOREST SCHOOL INC — $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC — $15,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMERCYWORKSINCORPORATED — $15,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLANDINC — $12,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $7,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INC — $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF HOWARD COUNTY — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA NEW CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCREDIT ABUSE RESISTANCE EDUCATION — $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR BLOOD AND CANCER RESEARCHINC
  • Who funds GARRISON FOREST SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds FOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BINGHAMTON INC
  • Who funds MERCYWORKSINCORPORATED
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLANDINC
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INC
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF HOWARD COUNTY
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds A NEW CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE INC
  • Who funds CREDIT ABUSE RESISTANCE EDUCATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Slotnick Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph