Skip to content
Sky Lakes Medical Center Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Sky Lakes Medical Center Foundation

To advance the vision and mission of sky lakes medical center through philanthropy; the foundation's work is fundraising and stewardship.

$3.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$11MFood & Nutrition$102kReligion$31kYouth Development$20kEducation$8k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $3,130,494, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,336,191 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $205,697 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $250k+1 grant · $3.1M
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$34M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SKY LAKES MEDICAL CENTER$3,104,994
OREGON TECH$10,000
FRIENDS OF KLAMATH COUNTY LIBRARY$10,000
STEENS SPORTS PARK$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $92k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%KLAMATH GROWN: $62k → 16%KLAMATH GROWN: $30k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 3 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

$15M
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+24%

Still filing today

100%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    SKY LAKES MEDICAL CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14M · revenue +62%
  • KH
    KLAMATH HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $393k · revenue +15%
  • KG
    KLAMATH GROWN
    2× · 2023–2024 · $92k

Funded once

  • IY
    INTEGRAL YOUTH SERVICES
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +21%
  • FT
    FAITH TABERNACLE
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • BC
    BAPTIST CHURCH ON HOMEDALE
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Klamath Co Economic Development Assn

The organization's mission is to promote new and existing business development in southern oregon.

—
2
Klamath Works Inc

To create total community commitment for helping people in need by developing a campus and programs of holistic and collaborative services with the goal of self-sufficiency based upon effort and reward.

Employment
3
Klamath Watershed Partnership Bill Lehman

To conserve, enhance, and restore the natural resources of the klamath basin while ensuring the long-term sustainability of the regional economy and local communities.

Environment
4
Klamath Lake Land Trust

Preserving the natural legacy of the upper klamath basin.

—
5
Klamath Hospice Inc

The organization operates a comprehensive program that provides medical, emotional, social and spiritual care to seriously ill patients and their families. the organization provides bereavement support and education on end-of-life issues…

—
6
Klamath Humane Society Inc

Animal shelter

Animals
7
Klamath Basin Senior Citizens' Center

To promote the physical, social, intellectual, emotional, and economic well-being of seniors. to provide and maintain opportunities for seniors to remain connected and attached to others and the community at large. to provide oppurtunities…

Human Services
8
Klamath Lake Counties Food Bank

Provide food to underprivileged and indigent residents of klamath, lake and siskiyou counties of southern oregon and northern california and to address hunger by providing food to emergency food assistance programs and support other…

—
9
Klamath Family Head Start

The mission of klamath family head start is to serve all eligible klamath county, oregon children & families in order to contribute to a healthy, diverse, & cooperative community.

Education
10
Klamath Advocacy Center

24 hour crisis intervention and education center

—
11
Klamath Bird Observatory

Klamath bird observatory advances bird and habitat conservation through science, education, and partnerships.

Animals
12
Central Oregon Health Quality Alliance

Our mission is to promote health for the benefit of the community by identifying and supporting healthcare innovation and collaboration to achieve improved quality, reduced costs, and improved patient experience.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Klamath Health Partnership Inc; the most unlike its peers is Crosspoint Christian School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SKY LAKES MEDICAL CENTER: $14,132,576 · HealthSKY LAKES MEDICAL CENTER+1 more: $393,097 · HealthKLAMATH GROWN: $92,250 · Human ServicesINTEGRAL YOUTH SERVICES: $20,000 · OtherFAITH TABERNACLE: $11,934 · OtherBAPTIST CHURCH ON HOMEDALE: $11,600 · OtherOREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,211 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE KLAMATH COUNTY LIBRARY: $10,000 · OtherABIDING PLACE MINISTRIES: $7,000 · OtherOREGON TECH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationCROSSPOINT CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $7,930 · EducationKLAMATH COMMUNITY YOUTH SPORTS COMP: $5,500 · Recreation & Sports
Health$14,525,673Human Services$92,250Other$70,745Education$17,930Recreation & Sports$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSKY LAKES MEDICAL CENTER: $14,132,576 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetKLAMATH HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC: $393,097 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetKLAMATH GROWN: $92,250 over 2y, 21% of budgetINTEGRAL YOUTH SERVICES: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE KLAMATH COUNTY LIBRARY: $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetOREGON TECH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSPOINT CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $7,930 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sky Lakes Medical Center Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sky Lakes Medical Center Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Integral Youth Services: 29% of income from government
  • Klamath Health Partnership Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Sky Lakes Medical Center: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sky Lakes Medical Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home