· Private foundation
Six Talents Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DAYBREAK ARTS | $85,000 |
| SHARE MY MEALS INC | $15,000 |
| HORSEMANSHIP FOR HEROES | $5,500 |
| BUCHANAN ARTS INC | $5,000 |
| THE CONTRIBUTOR INC | $5,000 |
| CORAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE | $5,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC | $5,000 |
| GIRLS ON THE RUN NEW JERSEY EAST | $5,000 |
| THE RENO PHILHARMONIC | $5,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY | $5,000 |
| NOTRE DAME CLUB OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY | $2,850 |
| DELBARTON SCHOOL | $2,000 |
| COUNCIL OF NEW JERSEY GRANTMAKERS | $75 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NMNevada Museum of Art7× · 2017–2024 · $809k · revenue +199%
- DADAYBREAK ARTS6× · 2020–2025 · $195k · revenue +65% · 31% of their budget
- RHRenown Health Foundation4× · 2019–2023 · $114k · revenue +355%
Funded once
- NNNorthern Nevada HIV Outpatient Program Education and Servicesone grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue -20%
- FHFENWICK HIGH SCHOOL CAPITAL CAMPAIGNone grant, 2021 · $15k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Renown Health makes a genuine difference in the health and well-being of the people and communities we serve.
Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for all individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.
To create intimate, inspirational musical experiences by engaging the community through vibrant music making by the chamber orchestra and chamber ensembles.
NHF supports, encourages and coordinates the development of comprehensive, integrated health care-related services for the advancement and well-being of the community, in furtherance of the purposes of Newport Hospital (see Schedule O)
Enhancing the quality of life through integrated healthcare.to provide physical, emotional, and spiritual support and care for the terminally ill, families, and others through all phases of an illness so that they may live as fully and as…
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
To enhance the health and well-being of the communities we serve.
Facilitate gifts & grants for the benefit of the University of Nevada, Reno to enhance the quality of education through charitable giving.
Sierra nevada memorial hospital ("snmh") is committed to improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.
The Nevada Alumni Association is here to foster and cultivate a common bond of pride, affinity and connection among alumni, students, prospective students and friends of the University of Nevada, Reno through quality programs, services and…
Home Health and Hospice Care provides trusted patient centered services that enhance each individual's independence and quality throughout life.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tahoe Family Solutions Inc and the most unlike its peers is West Morris Soccer Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 9. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 35% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 20% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Nevada Museum of Art ↗
- Who funds DAYBREAK ARTS ↗
- Who funds Sierra Nevada College ↗
- Who funds Renown Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds Northern Nevada HIV Outpatient Program Education and Services ↗
- Who funds HIGH FIVES NONPROFIT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds Community Foundation of Northern Nevada ↗
- Who funds SHARE MY MEALS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY ↗
- Who funds HORSEMANSHIP FOR HEROES ↗
- Who funds WEST MORRIS SOCCER CLUB ↗
- Who funds RENO PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds BUCHANAN ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds EDDY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds THE CONTRIBUTOR INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
- Who funds INCLINE VILLAGE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tahoe Community Foundation · The Scheffel Family Charitable Trust · The Nell J Redfield Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · The E L Cord Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Codd Family Foundation · Deborah and Tj Day Foundation · Courage Sans Peur Foundation · Offerdahl Family Foundation · Thelma B & Thomas P Hart Foundation · Peek Family Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Six Talents Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.