Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Simchas Dovid Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$199k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$1.7MPhilanthropy$990kHealth$58kInternational$32kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $24k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $175k
$175,200
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION BNAI YESHIA$175,200
FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$24,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YESHIVA TORAS CHEMED INC: $18k → 9%TOV V CHESED FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%CONGREGATION SHAREI EZRA INC: $10k → 14%ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY: $30k → 20%YESHIVA TORAS CHEMED INC: $10k → 9%TOV VCHESED: $4k → 14%CONGREGATION YETEV LEV: $7k → 20%TSHEBINER YESHIVA KOHAV MIYAACOV: $10k → 14%CONGREGATION YETEV LEV: $7k → 20%CONGREGATION YETEV LEV: $6k → 20%CONGREGATION YETEV LEV: $6k → 20%CONGREGATION YESHIVA LOMDEI TORAH: $10k → 20%YESHIVA BNOS AHAVAS ISRAEL: $87k → 20%YESHIVA BNOS AHAVAS ISRAEL: $79k → 20%CONG KHAL TZEMACH TZADIK VIZNITZ: $26k → 20%KOLLEL EREV UBOKER ODEH HASHEM: $23k → 20%CONG TZEMACH TZADIK VIZNITZ: $10k → 20%CONG TZEMACH TZADIK VIZNITZ: $10k → 20%CONG KHAL TZEMACH TZADIK VIZNITZ: $10k → 20%KOLLEL EREV UBOKER ODEH HASHEM: $10k → 20%YETEV LEV INC: $8k → 20%KHAL CHASIDEI BELZ: $6k → 20%HISACHDUS AVREICHEM OF YETEV LEV: $5k → 20%CONGREGATION BNAI YESHIA: $175k → 20%CONGREGATION BNAI YESHIA: $166k → 20%CONGREGATION BNAI YESHIA: $166k → 20%CONGREGATION BNAI YESHIA: $150k → 20%CONGREGATION BNAI YESHIA: $140k → 20%CONGREGATION BNAI YESHIA: $130k → 20%CONGREGATION BNAI YESHIA: $121k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERKAZ: $24k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS RAMOT TORAH SCHOOL: $5k → 20%THE OJC FUND: $275k → 20%THE OJC FUND: $131k → 20%BETH HAMEDRASH DGARDEN HILLS: $93k → 20%THE OJC FUND: $30k → 20%YESHIVA OHR YOSEPH: $11k → 20%THE OJC FUND: $8k → 20%MESAMCHE LEV-VIYOEL MOISHE INC: $6k → 20%CONG VIZNITZ DKHAL TORAS CHAIM: $5k → 20%NEVEI HACHESED: $21k → 20%ONEG SHABBOS AND YOM TOV: $20k → 20%NEVEI HACHESED: $19k → 20%ONEG SHABBOS AND YOM TOV: $10k → 20%ONEG SHABBOS AND YOM TOV: $10k → 20%CHESED VOLUNTEERS OF WILLIAMSBURG: $18k → 20%YESHIVA OHR YISROEL: $12k → 20%MACHNE OHEL MOSHE DKRASNA: $12k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 17 repeat orgs$280k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
23

Total granted

$1.5M
$280k

Still filing today

0%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyReligionInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    CONGREGATION BNAI YESHIA
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.0M
  • YB
    YESHIVA BNOS AHAVAS ISRAEL
    2× · 2021–2022 · $166k
  • OS
    ONEG SHABBOS AND YOM TOV
    3× · 2019–2022 · $40k

Funded once

  • BH
    BETH HAMEDRASH DGARDEN HILLS
    one grant, 2022 · $93k
  • RC
    ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue -5%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERKAZ CHASIDEI VIZNITZ INC
    one grant, 2018 · $24k · revenue -1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tov V Chesed Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
3
The Yad Moach Vlev Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Tzemach Yifroch Foundation
5
Ahavas Torah V'chesed
Philanthropy
6
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
8
Yad Yosef Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Ohel Yakov Foundation
10
Zichron Boruch Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Zichron Chaim Meir Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chayim V Chesed and the most unlike its peers is Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%6%<5yr16%6%5–10yr21%13%10–20yr23%47%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr5%0%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr16%1%5–10yr21%1%10–20yr23%24%20–35yr13%73%35–55yr5%0%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
11%
1,808/15,862

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONGREGATION BNAI YESHIA — $1,048,920 · OtherCONGREGATION BNAI YESHIAYESHIVA BNOS AHAVAS ISRAEL — $166,000 · OtherYESHIVA BNOS AHAVAS ISRAELBETH HAMEDRASH DGARDEN HILLS — $93,000 · OtherBETH HAMEDRASH DGARDEN HILLS+31 more — $375,272 · Other+31 moreFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $528,000 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS …THE OJC FUND — $444,000 · EducationTHE OJC FUNDROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC — $30,000 · PhilanthropyYESHIVA OHR YISROEL — $11,800 · PhilanthropyTHE TOV VCHESED FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyYETEV LEV INC — $8,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERKAZ CHASIDEI VIZNITZ INC — $23,500 · InternationalCHAYIM V CHESED — $3,600 · Religion
Other$1,683,192Community Improvement$528,000Education$444,000Philanthropy$59,800International$23,500Religion$3,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $528,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OJC FUND — $444,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERKAZ CHASIDEI VIZNITZ INC — $23,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE TOV VCHESED FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetCHAYIM V CHESED — $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND
  • Who funds THE OJC FUND
  • Who funds ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERKAZ CHASIDEI VIZNITZ INC
  • Who funds THE TOV VCHESED FOUNDATION
  • Who funds YETEV LEV INC
  • Who funds CHAYIM V CHESED

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY40.8× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Zelig and Rifky Weiss Family Foundation Inc · Guardian Family Foundation Inc · Bochner Foundation · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Chasdei Chaya Foundation Tr · Kanfei Yoneh Foundation · Hps Foundation · Keren Ish Foundation · B&M Steinmetz Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Simchas Dovid Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Simchas Dovid Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Simchas Dovid Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph