Skip to content

· Private foundation

Signal Peak Community Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$236k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$61k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$583kHealth$321kPublic Safety & Disaster$265kEducation$265kArts & Culture$211kCommunity Improvement$102kHuman Services$57kCrime & Legal$44kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $137k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$60,573
Individual grant recipient$34,519
Individual grant recipient$26,469
MELSTONE PUBLIC SCHOOLS$17,842
MONTANA TECH OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA$15,500
MUSSELSHELL GOLDEN VALLEY 4-H COUNCIL$14,759
MELSTONE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$14,722
Individual grant recipient$12,750
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - NORTHERN$7,000
ROUNDUP BASEBALL INC$5,456
MSU BILLINGS CITY COLLEGE$5,000
MONTANA TREASURED PIECEMAKERS QUILTS$5,000
WYO TECH$5,000
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BILLINGS$2,500
MARKETPLACE FOR KIDS$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%QUILTS OF VALOR: $5k → 7%QUILTS OF VALOR: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MT
ND
MA
WY
IA
CO
MD
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 33 repeat orgs$222k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
22

Total granted

$1.8M
$181k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+12%

Still filing today

21%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    ROUNDUP MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $317k · revenue +127%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MUSSELSHELL SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2018–2023 · $27k · revenue +5% · 40% of their budget
  • CC
    CARROLL COLLEGE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $13k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • MC
    MUSSELSHELL COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2019 · $49k
  • ES
    EARTH SCIENCE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $31k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $24k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College

Located in south hadley, massachusetts, mount holyoke college is a highly selective, nondenominational, residential, research liberal arts college for women that is gender-diverse and welcomes applications from female, transgender, and…

Education
4
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
5
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
6
University of Mary

The University of Mary exists to serve the religious, academic and cultural needs of the people in this region and beyond.(Continued on Schedule O)

Education
7
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
8
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
9
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
10
Baylor University

The mission of baylor university is to educate men and women for worldwide leadership and service by integrating academic excellence and christian commitment within a caring community.

Education
11
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
12
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma Christian University; the most unlike its peers is Roundup Backpack Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $454,011 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $125,019 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $96,457 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMELSTONE QUICK RESPONSE UNIT: $85,000 · OtherMUSSELSHELL VALLEY HISTORICAL MUSEUM INC: $60,000 · OtherRODEO ROUNDUP: $59,295 · OtherROUNDUP PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $57,545 · Other+46 more: $722,567 · Other+46 moreROUNDUP MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $316,634 · HealthROUNDUP MEMORIAL …FRIENDS OF MUSSELSHELL SCHOOL INC: $26,749 · Recreation & SportsCARROLL COLLEGE: $13,000 · EducationWASHINGTON COLLEGE: $7,000 · EducationOklahoma Christian University: $4,500 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationQUILTS OF VALOR FOUNDATION: $7,000 · Human ServicesROUNDUP BACKPACK PROGRAM: $500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,659,894Health$316,634Recreation & Sports$26,749Education$26,500Human Services$7,000Food & Nutrition$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROUNDUP MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $316,634 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF MUSSELSHELL SCHOOL INC: $26,749 over 3y, 40% of budgetCARROLL COLLEGE: $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON COLLEGE: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetQUILTS OF VALOR FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMUSSELSHELL COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $5,061 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetOklahoma Christian University: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROUNDUP MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MUSSELSHELL SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds CARROLL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds QUILTS OF VALOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MUSSELSHELL COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Signal Peak Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Signal Peak Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 2% of income from government
  • Washington College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Signal Peak’s filings →

More from the funding graph