Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Sigma Alpha Epsilon Foundation

To support its members and their chapters to help fulfill their educational aspirations and goals; to promote programs teaching leadership, scholarship, and personal development; and to ensure the presevation of Levere Memorial Temple.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$6.1MHousing & Shelter$1.7MCommunity Improvement$15k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $682,671 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,340,489 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $657,818 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $79k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $303k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$97,184
Median grant
5
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Alabama Alpha Mu Fraternal Association$300,000
Mississippi Theta House Corporation of SAE$106,168
Wyoming Alpha SAE Fraternity House Corporation$100,000
Georgia Phi Association of Sigma Alpha Epsilon Inc$97,184
Illinois Beta Housing LLC$35,000
North Dakota Alpha Housing LLC$19,319
SAE Pennsylvania Zeta Chapter$15,000
Kansas Gamma SAE Building & Education Foundation$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON BUILDING ASSOC: $450k → 13%NEW YORK EPSILON: $546k → 11%IOWA DELTA ALUMNI ASSOC: $199k → 10%Alabama Alpha Mu Fraternal Association: $300k → 15%KANSAS ALPHA: $294k → 15%Georgia Phi Association of Sigma Alpha Epsilon Inc: $97k → 13%OHEP - DEVOTIE HALL ASOOC: $279k → 9%DEVOTIE HALL ASSOCIATION: $93k → 16%MISSISSIPPI THETA CHAPTER: $1.3M → 14%HOUSE CORP OF MISSISSIPPI THETA: $62k → 24%Wyoming Alpha SAE Fraternity House Corporation: $100k → 17%SOUTH DAKOTA SIGMA: $665k → 20%SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON BUILDING ASSOC: $30k → 13%ALABAMA ALPHA MU FRATERNAL ASSOC: $150k → 15%OHEP - DEVOTIE HALL ASOOC: $45k → 9%MISSISSIPPI THETA CHAPTER: $174k → 14%SOUTH DAKOTA SIGMA: $151k → 20%NEBRASKA LAMBDA PI: $60k → 13%SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON FRATERNITY: $150k → 14%SOUTH DAKOTA SIGMA: $74k → 20%SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON: $150k → 14%SOUTH DAKOTA SIGMA: $62k → 20%SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON: $150k → 14%SOUTH DAKOTA SIGMA: $51k → 20%IOWA DELTA ALUMNI ASSOC: $40k → 10%MICHIGAN GAMMA HOUSING: $131k → 14%SOUTH DAKOTA SIGMA: $39k → 20%OHIO TAU HOUSING LLC: $130k → 14%SOUTH DAKOTA SIGMA: $31k → 20%OREGON BETA HOUSING LLC: $130k → 14%NORTH DAKOTA ALPHA HOUSING LLC: $126k → 14%MICHIGAN GAMMA HOUSING LLC: $120k → 14%SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON: $115k → 14%SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON: $115k → 14%SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON: $115k → 14%SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON: $115k → 14%MISSISSIPPI THETA CHAPTER: $114k → 14%Mississippi Theta House Corporation of SAE: $106k → 14%MICHIGAN GAMMA HOUSING LLC: $88k → 14%SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON FRATERNITY: $75k → 14%OHIO TAU HOUSING LLC: $49k → 14%MICHIGAN GAMMA HOUSING LLC: $44k → 14%Illinois Beta Housing LLC: $35k → 14%INDIANA SIGMA HOUSING LLC: $29k → 14%INDIANA GAMMA HOUSING LLC: $29k → 14%SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON: $25k → 14%INDIANA DELTA HOUSING LLC: $25k → 14%NORTH DAKOTA ALPHA HOUSING LLC: $23k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
WY
SD
IA
OH
NE
KS
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.5M · 16 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
8

Total granted

$6.5M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
0%

Still filing today

63%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $328k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    Missississippi Theta Chapter of Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +265%
  • SA
    Sigma Alpha Epsilon Foundation
    6× · 2017–2022 · $785k · revenue +73%
  • SA
    SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON BUILDING ASSN
    3× · 2017–2021 · $540k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • LA
    LAMBDA ALPHA EPSILON FRATERNITY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $546k · revenue -67% · 65% of their budget
  • SA
    SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON FRATERNITY OF KANSAS
    one grant, 2024 · $294k · revenue -18% · 32% of their budget
  • OB
    OREGON BETA HOUSING LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $130k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Phi Kappa Psi - Oregon Alpha Chapter S&T Fraternity Management

Housing for college fraternity

—
2
Sigma Alpha Epsilon Club of Columbia Missouri

Lodging for non-profit fraternal organization

—
3
Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity

To maintain and preserve the chapter house for the georgia beta chapter of sigma alpha epsilon at the university of georgia

—
4
Sigma Tau of Kappa Delta Housing Associa

Provide Chapter House for Students

—
5
Sigma Alpha Epsilon

Fraternity

—
6
Sc Delta Housing Corporation

Support the sc delta chapter of sigma alpha epsilon in the management of an on-campus house/facility.

Education
7
Epsilon Psi House Corporation

Provide housing and meeting place for members

Education
8
Alpha Pi Building Corporation

Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.

Recreation & Sports
9
Sigma Phi Epsilon Fraternity Ohio Gamma Chapter

Provide social/academic/education activities and housing/meals for student members of sigma phi epsilon fraternity at ohio state university

—
10
Alpha Gamma Club

Provide Housing for Members of Local Chapter of Kappa Sigma Fraternity

—
11
Sigma Nu Corporation of Oklahoma

To provide student housing for University of Oklahoma members of Sigma Nu Fraternity.

Education
12
Georgia Tech Chapter of Delta Chi Fraternity Housing Corporation

Chapter housing leased to members to provide an environment for study, sleep, hygiene, meals and fellowship, suitable for the development of men attending the institute for education.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sigma Alpha Epsilon Building Assn and the most unlike its peers is Lambda Alpha Epsilon Fraternity Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Missississippi Theta Chapter of Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity — $1,642,615 · OtherMissississippi Theta Chapter of Sigma Alpha Epsilon FraternitySouth Dakota Sigma Chapter House Association — $1,073,906 · OtherSouth Dakota Sigma Chapter House AssociationLAMBDA ALPHA EPSILON FRATERNITY INC — $546,000 · OtherLAMBDA ALPHA EPSILON FRATERNITY INCSIGMA ALPHA EPSILON BUILDING ASSN — $539,741 · OtherSIGMA ALPHA EPSILON BUILDING ASSNAlabama Alpha Mu Fraternal Association — $450,000 · OtherAlabama Alpha Mu Fraternal AssociationDEVOTIE HALL ASSOCIATION — $416,227 · OtherDEVOTIE HALL ASSOCIATIONMICHIGAN GAMMA HOUSING — $338,414 · OtherSIGMA ALPHA EPSILON FRATERNITY OF KANSAS — $294,000 · OtherSIGMA ALPHA EPSILON FRATERNITY — $239,029 · Other+16 more — $1,385,950 · Other+16 moreSigma Alpha Epsilon Foundation — $785,000 · EducationSigma Alpha E…GEORGIA PHI ASSOCIATION OF SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON INC — $97,184 · EducationGEORGIA PHI A…+2 more — $41,837 · Education
Other$6,925,882Education$924,021

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMissississippi Theta Chapter of Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity — $1,642,615 over 4y, 18% of budgetSouth Dakota Sigma Chapter House Association — $1,073,906 over 7y, 69% of budgetSigma Alpha Epsilon Foundation — $785,000 over 6y, 5.2% of budgetLAMBDA ALPHA EPSILON FRATERNITY INC — $546,000 over 1y, 65% of budgetSIGMA ALPHA EPSILON BUILDING ASSN — $539,741 over 3y, 12% of budgetAlabama Alpha Mu Fraternal Association — $450,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetSIGMA ALPHA EPSILON FRATERNITY OF KANSAS — $294,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetSIGMA ALPHA EPSILON FRATERNITY — $239,029 over 2y, 61% of budgetSigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity — $225,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetOKLAHOMA MU ALUMNI CORPORATION — $191,400 over 5y, 44% of budgetHouse Corporation of Mississippi Theta of Sigma Alpha Epsilon — $106,168 over 1y, 16% of budgetGEORGIA PHI ASSOCIATION OF SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON INC — $97,184 over 1y, 24% of budgetSIGMA ALPHA EPSILON FRATERNITY — $40,241 over 4y, 11% of budgetSAE Financial & Housing Corp — $29,400 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTexas Tau for Sigma Alpha Epsilon Housing Authority — $12,437 over 1y, 5.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sigma Alpha Epsilon Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines